Multi-criteria decision model for risk prioritisation involving multiple decision-makers: an application of composition of probabilistic preferences combined with FMEA in the supply chain

IF 2.7 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Ramon Swell Gomes Rodrigues Casado, M. M. Silva, L. C. Silva
{"title":"Multi-criteria decision model for risk prioritisation involving multiple decision-makers: an application of composition of probabilistic preferences combined with FMEA in the supply chain","authors":"Ramon Swell Gomes Rodrigues Casado, M. M. Silva, L. C. Silva","doi":"10.1108/ijqrm-03-2020-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper aims to propose a multi-criteria model for risk prioritisation associated to supply chain management involving multiple decision-makers.Design/methodology/approachThe model integrates the composition of probabilistic preferences (CPP) on the failure modes analysis and its effects (FMEA) criteria. First, the authors carried out a probabilistic transformation of the numerical evaluations of the multiple decision-makers on the FMEA criteria regarding the internal risks that affect the chain of clothing pole in the Agreste region of Pernambuco. Then, the authors proposed the use of the Kendall's concordance coefficient W to aggregate these evaluations.FindingsContrary to expectations, the two main risks to be investigated as a model suggestion was related to the context of supply chain suppliers and not related to the raw material costs. Besides, a simulation with the traditional FMEA was carried out, and comparing with the model result, the simulation is worth highlighting seven consistent differences along the two rankings.Research limitations/implicationsThe focus was restricted to the use of only internal chain risks.Practical implicationsThe proposed model can contribute to the improvement of the decisions within organisations that make up the chains, thus guaranteeing a better quality in risk management.Originality/valueEstablishing a more effective representation of uncertain information related to traditional FMEA treatment involving multiple decision-makers means identifying in advance the potential risks, providing a better supply chain control.","PeriodicalId":14193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-03-2020-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThe paper aims to propose a multi-criteria model for risk prioritisation associated to supply chain management involving multiple decision-makers.Design/methodology/approachThe model integrates the composition of probabilistic preferences (CPP) on the failure modes analysis and its effects (FMEA) criteria. First, the authors carried out a probabilistic transformation of the numerical evaluations of the multiple decision-makers on the FMEA criteria regarding the internal risks that affect the chain of clothing pole in the Agreste region of Pernambuco. Then, the authors proposed the use of the Kendall's concordance coefficient W to aggregate these evaluations.FindingsContrary to expectations, the two main risks to be investigated as a model suggestion was related to the context of supply chain suppliers and not related to the raw material costs. Besides, a simulation with the traditional FMEA was carried out, and comparing with the model result, the simulation is worth highlighting seven consistent differences along the two rankings.Research limitations/implicationsThe focus was restricted to the use of only internal chain risks.Practical implicationsThe proposed model can contribute to the improvement of the decisions within organisations that make up the chains, thus guaranteeing a better quality in risk management.Originality/valueEstablishing a more effective representation of uncertain information related to traditional FMEA treatment involving multiple decision-makers means identifying in advance the potential risks, providing a better supply chain control.
涉及多个决策者的风险优先级多标准决策模型:概率偏好组合与FMEA在供应链中的应用
本文旨在提出一个涉及多个决策者的供应链管理风险优先级的多准则模型。该模型将概率偏好(CPP)的组成与失效模式分析及其影响(FMEA)标准相结合。首先,针对影响Pernambuco Agreste地区服装杆链内部风险的FMEA准则,对多个决策者的数值评价进行了概率变换。然后,作者提出使用肯德尔一致性系数W来汇总这些评价。与预期相反,作为模型建议要调查的两个主要风险与供应链供应商的背景有关,而与原材料成本无关。此外,利用传统的FMEA进行了仿真,与模型结果进行了比较,仿真结果突出了两种排名的七个一致之处。研究的局限性/意义研究的重点仅限于使用内部链风险。实际意义所提出的模型有助于改进构成供应链的组织内部的决策,从而保证风险管理的更好质量。原创性/价值建立与涉及多个决策者的传统FMEA处理相关的不确定信息的更有效表示意味着提前识别潜在风险,提供更好的供应链控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: In today''s competitive business and industrial environment, it is essential to have an academic journal offering the most current theoretical knowledge on quality and reliability to ensure that top management is fully conversant with new thinking, techniques and developments in the field. The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (IJQRM) deals with all aspects of business improvements and with all aspects of manufacturing and services, from the training of (senior) managers, to innovations in organising and processing to raise standards of product and service quality. It is this unique blend of theoretical knowledge and managerial relevance that makes IJQRM a valuable resource for managers striving for higher standards.Coverage includes: -Reliability, availability & maintenance -Gauging, calibration & measurement -Life cycle costing & sustainability -Reliability Management of Systems -Service Quality -Green Marketing -Product liability -Product testing techniques & systems -Quality function deployment -Reliability & quality education & training -Productivity improvement -Performance improvement -(Regulatory) standards for quality & Quality Awards -Statistical process control -System modelling -Teamwork -Quality data & datamining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信