Economic Rationality of Residents Living in the Area Prone to Merapi Volcanic Disaster

Napsiah Napsiah, B. Gunawan, O. Abdoellah, M. Sulaeman
{"title":"Economic Rationality of Residents Living in the Area Prone to Merapi Volcanic Disaster","authors":"Napsiah Napsiah, B. Gunawan, O. Abdoellah, M. Sulaeman","doi":"10.15294/komunitas.v9i2.10002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research concerned here was to know the economic rationality of residents who dwelled again in their \nformer village after the eruption of Mount Merapi in 2010 and refused to be relocated by the government. \nA combined research method, namely, a combination between a qualitative method and a quantitative one, \nwas used to uncover the rationality. The qualitative part of the research was conducted first by deciding \ninformants considered knowledgeable about the matter under research. Then the informants were interviewed \nin turns decided via snowball sampling. Some secondary data were used to support the qualitative \nresearch. As for the quantitative part of the research, it was conducted afterwards by turning members of \nthe households in the village into respondents. The finding of the research is as follows. The residents perceive \nthe disaster not only as a dangerous natural phenomenon but also as an economic blessing because \ntourists’ visits to the areas suffering from the impact of the disaster enable residents to have activities that \nhave economic value. That economic rationality was what motivated them to return to their village though \nits condition is categorized by the government as unfit for dwelling.","PeriodicalId":17912,"journal":{"name":"KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE","volume":"9 1","pages":"203-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KOMUNITAS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v9i2.10002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The research concerned here was to know the economic rationality of residents who dwelled again in their former village after the eruption of Mount Merapi in 2010 and refused to be relocated by the government. A combined research method, namely, a combination between a qualitative method and a quantitative one, was used to uncover the rationality. The qualitative part of the research was conducted first by deciding informants considered knowledgeable about the matter under research. Then the informants were interviewed in turns decided via snowball sampling. Some secondary data were used to support the qualitative research. As for the quantitative part of the research, it was conducted afterwards by turning members of the households in the village into respondents. The finding of the research is as follows. The residents perceive the disaster not only as a dangerous natural phenomenon but also as an economic blessing because tourists’ visits to the areas suffering from the impact of the disaster enable residents to have activities that have economic value. That economic rationality was what motivated them to return to their village though its condition is categorized by the government as unfit for dwelling.
默拉皮火山灾害易发地区居民的经济合理性
这里关注的研究是为了了解2010年默拉皮火山爆发后再次居住在原村庄并拒绝政府搬迁的居民的经济合理性。采用定性与定量相结合的研究方法来揭示其合理性。研究的定性部分首先是通过决定被认为了解所研究事项的线人来进行的。然后,通过滚雪球抽样的方式,轮流采访举报人。一些次要数据被用来支持定性研究。至于研究的定量部分,是在事后将村里的家庭成员变成受访者进行的。研究结果如下。居民们认为这场灾难不仅是一种危险的自然现象,而且是一种经济祝福,因为游客前往受灾地区使居民能够进行具有经济价值的活动。这种经济理性促使他们回到自己的村庄,尽管政府将其状况归类为不适合居住。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信