The Reflective Practice Writing Bicycle: A Reflective Analysis Tool for Engaged Learning

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Edmund Pries
{"title":"The Reflective Practice Writing Bicycle: A Reflective Analysis Tool for Engaged Learning","authors":"Edmund Pries","doi":"10.1558/RSTH.38261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional university education has focused on academic learning, which is followed by a graduate's attempts to apply this learning to various career-related pursuits. Experiential learning turns this focus on its head - at least partially. Instead of learning preceding praxis, learning now follows praxis. In this latter model, much of the post-praxis learning is focused and achieved via reflective analysis of experience - also called reflective practice - through written reflection. Reflective Practice Writing (RPW), also called Reflective Practice Journaling, is much more than traditional journaling. For reflective practice to effectively facilitate the learning process for students, RPW requires students to deeply probe and explore their experience to realize maximum learning. A guide or a \"tool\" to assist this process is useful and, I argue, required but, in too many cases, is either inadequate or not provided at all. This paper provides and describes such a reflective practice writing tool, which has been imagined as a bicycle - with a \"front wheel\" and a \"back wheel\" of spokes or questions. A reflective practice writing tool cannot, however, simply be developed on its own; it must be tied to a teaching and learning philosophy which has student learning integration and, ultimately, student transformation as its goal. The Reflective Practice Writing Bicycle is based precisely on such a teaching/learning philosophy, which is integrated into The RPW Bicycle tool itself.","PeriodicalId":40579,"journal":{"name":"Religious Studies and Theology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religious Studies and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/RSTH.38261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Traditional university education has focused on academic learning, which is followed by a graduate's attempts to apply this learning to various career-related pursuits. Experiential learning turns this focus on its head - at least partially. Instead of learning preceding praxis, learning now follows praxis. In this latter model, much of the post-praxis learning is focused and achieved via reflective analysis of experience - also called reflective practice - through written reflection. Reflective Practice Writing (RPW), also called Reflective Practice Journaling, is much more than traditional journaling. For reflective practice to effectively facilitate the learning process for students, RPW requires students to deeply probe and explore their experience to realize maximum learning. A guide or a "tool" to assist this process is useful and, I argue, required but, in too many cases, is either inadequate or not provided at all. This paper provides and describes such a reflective practice writing tool, which has been imagined as a bicycle - with a "front wheel" and a "back wheel" of spokes or questions. A reflective practice writing tool cannot, however, simply be developed on its own; it must be tied to a teaching and learning philosophy which has student learning integration and, ultimately, student transformation as its goal. The Reflective Practice Writing Bicycle is based precisely on such a teaching/learning philosophy, which is integrated into The RPW Bicycle tool itself.
反思练习写作自行车:参与式学习的反思分析工具
传统的大学教育侧重于学术学习,然后是毕业生尝试将这种学习应用于各种与职业相关的追求。体验式学习至少在一定程度上颠覆了这种关注。现在的学习不是在实践之前学习,而是在实践之后学习。在后一种模式中,大部分后实践学习都是通过书面反思,通过对经验的反思性分析(也称为反思性实践)来集中和实现的。反思性实践写作(RPW),也被称为反思性实践日记,远远超过了传统的日记。为了有效地促进学生的学习过程,RPW要求学生深入探究和探索自己的经验,以实现最大限度的学习。协助这一进程的指南或“工具”是有用的,我认为是必要的,但在太多情况下,要么不充分,要么根本没有提供。本文提供并描述了这样一种反思性的练习写作工具,它被想象成一辆自行车——有辐条或问题的“前轮”和“后轮”。然而,一种反思性的实践写作工具不能简单地自行开发;它必须与一种以学生学习整合为目标,最终以学生转变为目标的教学哲学相联系。反思练习写作自行车正是基于这样的教学哲学,它被整合到RPW自行车工具本身中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信