STEM-INQUIRY BRAINSTORMING: CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS IN STATIC FLUID MATERIAL

IF 0.2 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Saregar, S. Latifah, M. Hudha, F. Susanti, N. Susilowati
{"title":"STEM-INQUIRY BRAINSTORMING: CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING SKILLS IN STATIC FLUID MATERIAL","authors":"A. Saregar, S. Latifah, M. Hudha, F. Susanti, N. Susilowati","doi":"10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.506_periodico36_pgs_491_505.pdf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach has become an interesting research object. Several studies have proven that the STEM approach has overcome various learning problems. It involves many teaching and learning aspects, either the cognitive, affective, or psychomotor domains, positively affecting the students' learning outcomes. This study aimed to describe the effect of the STEM approach with the Brainstorming method on critical thinking and creative thinking skills of students in physics learning. This study employed quasi-experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design. The sampling was done through the simple random sampling technique with a total sample of 60 high school students. The instrument used in this study was an essay test instrument to measure critical thinking and creative thinking skills. The Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was used as the research hypothesis testing technique. The results showed that the significance score of critical thinking skills was 0.001, and the significance score of creative thinking skills was 0.019. So, it can be concluded that the application of the STEM approach with the Brainstorming method is effective in improving students' critical thinking and creative thinking skills in learning physics, both through multivariate tests and separate tests.\n","PeriodicalId":45103,"journal":{"name":"Periodico Tche Quimica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodico Tche Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v17.n36.2020.506_periodico36_pgs_491_505.pdf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) approach has become an interesting research object. Several studies have proven that the STEM approach has overcome various learning problems. It involves many teaching and learning aspects, either the cognitive, affective, or psychomotor domains, positively affecting the students' learning outcomes. This study aimed to describe the effect of the STEM approach with the Brainstorming method on critical thinking and creative thinking skills of students in physics learning. This study employed quasi-experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design. The sampling was done through the simple random sampling technique with a total sample of 60 high school students. The instrument used in this study was an essay test instrument to measure critical thinking and creative thinking skills. The Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was used as the research hypothesis testing technique. The results showed that the significance score of critical thinking skills was 0.001, and the significance score of creative thinking skills was 0.019. So, it can be concluded that the application of the STEM approach with the Brainstorming method is effective in improving students' critical thinking and creative thinking skills in learning physics, both through multivariate tests and separate tests.
干探究头脑风暴:在静态流体材料中的批判性和创造性思维技能
科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)方法已经成为一个有趣的研究对象。几项研究已经证明,STEM方法克服了各种学习问题。它涉及教学和学习的许多方面,无论是认知、情感还是精神运动领域,都对学生的学习成果产生积极影响。本研究旨在描述STEM方法与头脑风暴方法在物理学习中对学生批判性思维和创造性思维技能的影响。本研究采用非等效对照组设计的准实验研究。本研究采用简单随机抽样方法对60名高中生进行抽样。在这项研究中使用的工具是一个论文测试工具来衡量批判性思维和创造性思维技能。本研究采用多元方差分析(MANOVA)作为假设检验方法。结果显示,批判性思维技能显著性得分为0.001,创造性思维技能显著性得分为0.019。因此,无论通过多变量测试还是单独测试,都可以得出结论,STEM方法与头脑风暴方法的应用对于提高学生在物理学习中的批判性思维和创造性思维能力是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Periodico Tche Quimica
Periodico Tche Quimica CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, short communications (scientific publications), book reviews, forum articles, announcements or letters as well as interviews. Researchers from all countries are invited to publish on its pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信