Agreement Between Alberta Infant Motor Scale Assessment and Maternal Perception of Motor Development in Full-Term Infants

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Developmental Neurorehabilitation Pub Date : 2022-03-20 DOI:10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373

Rosana Silva Dos Santos, Amanda Otília Oliveira de Lima Barreto, Maria Carolina Chapellem P Barbosa da Silva, Hugo Ormond Vianna Sá Nogueira, R. Peres, Márcia Gonçalves Ribeiro, H. C. Ferreira

{"title":"Agreement Between Alberta Infant Motor Scale Assessment and Maternal Perception of Motor Development in Full-Term Infants","authors":"Rosana Silva Dos Santos, Amanda Otília Oliveira de Lima Barreto, Maria Carolina Chapellem P Barbosa da Silva, Hugo Ormond Vianna Sá Nogueira, R. Peres, Márcia Gonçalves Ribeiro, H. C. Ferreira","doi":"10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives To verify the agreement between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale assessment and maternal perception of the motor development in full-term infants. Methods This is a cross-sectional study involving 161 infants and mothers. Children were assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for motor developmental classification. Mothers completed questionnaires aiming to identify maternal profiles and impressions about their children’s development. The kappa test was used to analyze the concordance between AIMS and mother perceptions. Results A total of 83.2% of the sample was classified as typically developing and 16.8% as suspected or delayed development. The maternal impression indicates that 77% of infants are developing typically, 19.9% perceived their infants’ development as advanced, and 3.1% delayed development. There was low agreement between the mothers’ perceptions and AIMS classifications (kappa = 0.153) Conclusions Maternal perception of their infant’s development was unsatisfactory for evaluation of motor development because their perceptions did not agree with the findings of the AIMS.","PeriodicalId":51227,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Neurorehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To verify the agreement between the Alberta Infant Motor Scale assessment and maternal perception of the motor development in full-term infants. Methods This is a cross-sectional study involving 161 infants and mothers. Children were assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) for motor developmental classification. Mothers completed questionnaires aiming to identify maternal profiles and impressions about their children’s development. The kappa test was used to analyze the concordance between AIMS and mother perceptions. Results A total of 83.2% of the sample was classified as typically developing and 16.8% as suspected or delayed development. The maternal impression indicates that 77% of infants are developing typically, 19.9% perceived their infants’ development as advanced, and 3.1% delayed development. There was low agreement between the mothers’ perceptions and AIMS classifications (kappa = 0.153) Conclusions Maternal perception of their infant’s development was unsatisfactory for evaluation of motor development because their perceptions did not agree with the findings of the AIMS.

查看原文本刊更多论文

艾伯塔省婴儿运动量表评估与足月婴儿运动发育知觉的一致性

摘要目的验证阿尔伯塔省婴儿运动量表评估和母亲对足月婴儿运动发育的认知之间的一致性。方法这是一项涉及161名婴儿和母亲的横断面研究。使用艾伯塔省婴儿运动量表（AIMS）对儿童进行运动发育分类评估。母亲们完成了问卷调查，旨在确定母亲对孩子发展的概况和印象。kappa检验用于分析AIMS和母亲认知之间的一致性。结果83.2%的样本被归类为典型发育，16.8%的样本被分类为疑似或延迟发育。母体印象表明，77%的婴儿发育正常，19.9%的婴儿认为婴儿发育迟缓，3.1%的婴儿发育迟缓。母亲的认知与AIMS分类之间的一致性较低（kappa=0.153）。结论母亲对婴儿发育的认知不符合运动发育的评估，因为她们的认知不与AIMS的结果一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Developmental Neurorehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PEDIATRICS

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Developmental Neurorehabilitation aims to enhance recovery, rehabilitation and education of people with brain injury, neurological disorders, and other developmental, physical and intellectual disabilities. Although there is an emphasis on childhood, developmental disability can be considered from a lifespan perspective. This perspective acknowledges that development occurs throughout a person’s life and thus a range of impairments or diseases can cause a disability that can affect development at any stage of life.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格