Autism for the professions: one university, three colleges and one undergraduate course

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mary Carlson, Wendy Krueger, A. V. Van Hecke
{"title":"Autism for the professions: one university, three colleges and one undergraduate course","authors":"Mary Carlson, Wendy Krueger, A. V. Van Hecke","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-03-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper discusses the elements of successful university-level, cross-disciplinary course development using best practices to foster richer relational networks and to meet the complex demands of education and treatment for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Design/methodology/approachThe three authors created and taught a class on best practices in autism nine times. The authors assessed the knowledge base and attitudinal changes of undergraduates (most in psychology, speech pathology and audiology, and education) for two of the nine cohorts who were being prepared to work with individuals with ASD.Findings Pre- and postmeasures indicated significant improvement in knowledge and a predisposition to working in interdisciplinary teams. Anecdotally, a number of students indicated in course evaluations that this was their best undergraduate course.Practical implications The program development and research have pertinent implications for faculty who are preparing students for professions in which teamwork will be expected, for faculty preparing students to work with individuals with ASD and for any faculty who wish to engage in cross-disciplinary, collaborative teaching.Originality/valueThis is a unique look at best practices of college course development and best practices of the multiple professional fields for which students were being prepared. It was done across three different colleges within a university.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-03-2023-0018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper discusses the elements of successful university-level, cross-disciplinary course development using best practices to foster richer relational networks and to meet the complex demands of education and treatment for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Design/methodology/approachThe three authors created and taught a class on best practices in autism nine times. The authors assessed the knowledge base and attitudinal changes of undergraduates (most in psychology, speech pathology and audiology, and education) for two of the nine cohorts who were being prepared to work with individuals with ASD.Findings Pre- and postmeasures indicated significant improvement in knowledge and a predisposition to working in interdisciplinary teams. Anecdotally, a number of students indicated in course evaluations that this was their best undergraduate course.Practical implications The program development and research have pertinent implications for faculty who are preparing students for professions in which teamwork will be expected, for faculty preparing students to work with individuals with ASD and for any faculty who wish to engage in cross-disciplinary, collaborative teaching.Originality/valueThis is a unique look at best practices of college course development and best practices of the multiple professional fields for which students were being prepared. It was done across three different colleges within a university.
自闭症专业:一所大学,三所学院和一门本科课程
目的本文讨论了成功的大学水平跨学科课程开发的要素,使用最佳实践来培养更丰富的关系网络,并满足自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童教育和治疗的复杂需求。设计/方法论/方法三位作者创建并教授了一堂关于自闭症最佳实践的课程九次。作者评估了准备与ASD患者合作的九个队列中的两个队列的本科生的知识基础和态度变化(主要是心理学、言语病理学和听力学以及教育)。测量前和测量后的结果表明,他们的知识有了显着提高,并倾向于在跨学科团队中工作。有趣的是,许多学生在课程评估中表示,这是他们最好的本科课程。实践意义该项目的开发和研究对那些为学生从事期望团队合作的职业做准备的教师、为学生与ASD患者合作做准备的教员以及任何希望从事跨学科合作教学的教员都有相关的意义。独创性/价值这是对大学课程开发的最佳实践和学生所准备的多个专业领域的最佳实践的独特审视。这项研究是在一所大学内的三个不同学院进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信