Futurist Resistance: Gendered Critical Literacy in the Dystopian Age

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Jennifer Mitchell
{"title":"Futurist Resistance: Gendered Critical Literacy in the Dystopian Age","authors":"Jennifer Mitchell","doi":"10.1353/lit.2021.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article claims that recent dystopian fiction for teenagers presents critical literacy as futurity's primary form of activist resistance. Both M.T. Anderson's Feed (2002) and Patrick Ness's The Knife of Never Letting Go (2008) grapple with the far-reaching consequences of a society that has demonized literacy in various ways. Feed is a bleak examination of future America's uncritical, corporatized dependence on technology, theorizes narrative—both the ability to tell a story and the ability to interpret it—as a mode of resistance within a dark, corporate-dictated future. In the first of Ness's futuristic Chaos Walking books, young protagonist Todd struggles to reconcile what he has been taught and what is empirically true; his baggage is that of uncritical indoctrination. Both texts rely on young female characters to teach critical literacy: Violet encourages Titus to escape from his exaggerated albeit typical narcissistic teenage bubble while Viola is Todd's only point of entry into the only surviving written words in Prentisstown, his ma's journal. This article argues that the imagined futures in such literature conceptualizes our current need for analytical literacy, and the empathy constructed through it, in the face of \"alternative\" facts—theorizing resistance through critical reading as its own form of New Futurism.","PeriodicalId":44728,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","volume":"48 1","pages":"466 - 495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/lit.2021.0017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2021.0017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article claims that recent dystopian fiction for teenagers presents critical literacy as futurity's primary form of activist resistance. Both M.T. Anderson's Feed (2002) and Patrick Ness's The Knife of Never Letting Go (2008) grapple with the far-reaching consequences of a society that has demonized literacy in various ways. Feed is a bleak examination of future America's uncritical, corporatized dependence on technology, theorizes narrative—both the ability to tell a story and the ability to interpret it—as a mode of resistance within a dark, corporate-dictated future. In the first of Ness's futuristic Chaos Walking books, young protagonist Todd struggles to reconcile what he has been taught and what is empirically true; his baggage is that of uncritical indoctrination. Both texts rely on young female characters to teach critical literacy: Violet encourages Titus to escape from his exaggerated albeit typical narcissistic teenage bubble while Viola is Todd's only point of entry into the only surviving written words in Prentisstown, his ma's journal. This article argues that the imagined futures in such literature conceptualizes our current need for analytical literacy, and the empathy constructed through it, in the face of "alternative" facts—theorizing resistance through critical reading as its own form of New Futurism.
未来主义者的抵抗:反乌托邦时代的性别批判文学
摘要:本文认为,最近的青少年反乌托邦小说将批判性读写作为未来积极抵抗的主要形式。M.T. Anderson的《Feed》(2002)和Patrick Ness的《永不放手的刀》(2008)都在努力探讨一个以各种方式妖魔化读写能力的社会所带来的深远影响。《饲料》是对未来美国不加批判的、公司化的对技术的依赖的一种凄凉的审视,将叙事——讲故事的能力和解释故事的能力——理论化,作为一种抵抗黑暗的、公司化的未来的模式。在奈斯的未来主义小说《混沌行走》(Chaos Walking)的第一部中,年轻的主人公托德(Todd)努力调和他所接受的教育和经验真理;他的包袱是不加批判的灌输。这两篇文章都依靠年轻的女性角色来教授批判性素养:维奥莱特鼓励提图斯逃离他夸张但典型的自恋青少年泡沫,而维奥拉是托德进入他母亲日记中唯一幸存的文字的唯一入口。本文认为,这些文学作品中的想象未来概念化了我们当前对分析素养的需求,以及通过它构建的移情,面对“另类”事实——通过批判性阅读将抵抗理论化,作为自己的新未来主义形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COLLEGE LITERATURE
COLLEGE LITERATURE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信