Comparison of Effects of Two Drugs (Pregabalin & Celecoxib) on 24 hours Post-Operative Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Tibia Fracture Surgery

Q3 Medicine
A. S. Eraghi, Iman Azizpour, Mikaiel Hajializade
{"title":"Comparison of Effects of Two Drugs (Pregabalin & Celecoxib) on 24 hours Post-Operative Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Tibia Fracture Surgery","authors":"A. S. Eraghi, Iman Azizpour, Mikaiel Hajializade","doi":"10.2174/1876386302114010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Celecoxib is widely used in post-operative cases because of its ability to reduce postoperative opioid drug use. Currently, the use of this drug is common in post-operative cases. In various studies, pregabalin was used for the management of pain after spinal surgery to reduce the need for opioids.\n \n \n \n Since the treatment of tibia fractures and surgery is painful and has a long-term recovery, this study aimed to compare the effect of two drugs (pregabalin and celecoxib) on pain severity at 24 h postoperatively in patients having tibia fracture surgery. This would mark significant progress in taking the proper drug.\n \n \n \n In this probability clinical experiment, the sample consisted of 50 patients scheduled for tibia fractures, who were selected from the table of random numbers. Then, the patients were assigned into two groups: celecoxib (Group C) and pregabalin (Group P). In the first group, celecoxib was administered to patients at 1 h pre-operatively at a dose of 200 mg and 1 h post-operatively at a dose of 200 mg. In the second treatment group, patients received pregabalin at 1 h pre-operatively at a dose of 200 mg and 1 h post-operatively at a dose of 200 mg orally. Then VAS (visual analog scale) scores were recorded at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Finally, using SPSS software, qualitative variables were compared according to their percentage by the Chi-square test. For quantitative analysis of variables, the mean value of each group was calculated. The comparison of means was made by t-test.\n \n \n \n The VAS score was considerably lower at 24 hours after surgery in the pregabalin group than in the celecoxib-treated group. However, after 6 and 12 h of surgery, no statistically meaningful difference was observed. A less analgesic effect was observed in the group treated with celecoxib than pregabalin, which was statistically significant.\n \n \n \n Pregabalin improves postoperative pain, and it has more analgesic effects than celecoxib.\n","PeriodicalId":53614,"journal":{"name":"Open Pain Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Pain Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876386302114010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Celecoxib is widely used in post-operative cases because of its ability to reduce postoperative opioid drug use. Currently, the use of this drug is common in post-operative cases. In various studies, pregabalin was used for the management of pain after spinal surgery to reduce the need for opioids. Since the treatment of tibia fractures and surgery is painful and has a long-term recovery, this study aimed to compare the effect of two drugs (pregabalin and celecoxib) on pain severity at 24 h postoperatively in patients having tibia fracture surgery. This would mark significant progress in taking the proper drug. In this probability clinical experiment, the sample consisted of 50 patients scheduled for tibia fractures, who were selected from the table of random numbers. Then, the patients were assigned into two groups: celecoxib (Group C) and pregabalin (Group P). In the first group, celecoxib was administered to patients at 1 h pre-operatively at a dose of 200 mg and 1 h post-operatively at a dose of 200 mg. In the second treatment group, patients received pregabalin at 1 h pre-operatively at a dose of 200 mg and 1 h post-operatively at a dose of 200 mg orally. Then VAS (visual analog scale) scores were recorded at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Finally, using SPSS software, qualitative variables were compared according to their percentage by the Chi-square test. For quantitative analysis of variables, the mean value of each group was calculated. The comparison of means was made by t-test. The VAS score was considerably lower at 24 hours after surgery in the pregabalin group than in the celecoxib-treated group. However, after 6 and 12 h of surgery, no statistically meaningful difference was observed. A less analgesic effect was observed in the group treated with celecoxib than pregabalin, which was statistically significant. Pregabalin improves postoperative pain, and it has more analgesic effects than celecoxib.
普瑞巴林和塞来昔布两种药物对胫骨骨折术后24小时疼痛强度的影响比较
塞来昔布因其能够减少术后阿片类药物的使用而被广泛应用于术后病例。目前,这种药物在术后病例中使用很普遍。在各种研究中,普瑞巴林被用于脊柱手术后疼痛的管理,以减少对阿片类药物的需求。由于胫骨骨折的治疗和手术是痛苦的,并且需要长期的恢复,本研究旨在比较两种药物(普瑞巴林和塞来昔布)对胫骨骨折手术患者术后24 h疼痛严重程度的影响。这将标志着在正确用药方面取得了重大进展。在这个概率临床实验中,样本由50例胫骨骨折患者组成,他们是从随机数表中选择的。然后,将患者分为两组:塞来昔布(C组)和普瑞巴林(P组)。第一组患者术前1小时给药200 mg,术后1小时给药200 mg。在第二组治疗中,患者术前1小时给予普瑞巴林200 mg,术后1小时口服200 mg。分别于术后6、12、24 h记录VAS(视觉模拟评分)评分。最后,采用SPSS软件,用卡方检验比较各定性变量的百分比。为了对变量进行定量分析,计算各组的平均值。均数比较采用t检验。普瑞巴林组术后24小时VAS评分明显低于塞来昔布治疗组。然而,在手术6和12小时后,没有观察到统计学意义的差异。塞来昔布组的镇痛效果低于普瑞巴林组,差异有统计学意义。普瑞巴林改善术后疼痛,镇痛效果优于塞来昔布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Pain Journal
Open Pain Journal Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信