Interrogating Dispossession for Development in Ethiopia

IF 1.1 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI:10.1080/08039410.2021.1984305

Yonas Tesema

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I explore some of the implications of state land policy as an approach to analyzing the double dispossession – land and labor dispossessions. Despite a growing interest in the study of land dispossession in the global South, especially after the post-2008 financial crisis, examining the complexities between the land policy, land and labor dispossessions have relatively been overlooked. I discuss how the state’s land policy contributes to coercive land dispossession and how this aspect of dispossession becomes the precondition for the second dispossession – labor. The people who lost their land to investments concurrently lost their employment, and a new class of landless and jobless farmers is emerging.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在埃塞俄比亚审问剥夺发展

摘要本文探讨了国家土地政策的一些含义，并以此作为分析土地和劳动力双重剥夺的方法。尽管人们对发展中国家土地剥夺的研究越来越感兴趣，尤其是在2008年后的金融危机之后，但研究土地政策、土地和劳动力剥夺之间的复杂性相对被忽视了。我讨论了国家的土地政策是如何促成强制性土地剥夺的，以及这种剥夺是如何成为第二种剥夺——劳动的先决条件的。由于投资而失去土地的人同时失去了工作，一个新的无地和失业农民阶层正在出现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

FORUM FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Forum for Development Studies was established in 1974, and soon became the leading Norwegian journal for development research. While this position has been consolidated, Forum has gradually become an international journal, with its main constituency in the Nordic countries. The journal is owned by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) and the Norwegian Association for Development Research. Forum aims to be a platform for development research broadly defined – including the social sciences, economics, history and law. All articles are double-blind peer-reviewed. In order to maintain the journal as a meeting place for different disciplines, we encourage authors to communicate across disciplinary boundaries. Contributions that limit the use of exclusive terminology and frame the questions explored in ways that are accessible to the whole range of the Journal''s readership will be given priority.