The Urgency of Regulating Resale Royalty Right on Painting Copyrights in Indonesia (Comparative Study of Germany and Australia)

M. Masyhuri, Ahsana Nadiyya, Gresika Bunga Sylvana
{"title":"The Urgency of Regulating Resale Royalty Right on Painting Copyrights in Indonesia (Comparative Study of Germany and Australia)","authors":"M. Masyhuri, Ahsana Nadiyya, Gresika Bunga Sylvana","doi":"10.15294/jllr.v4i2.68103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Berne Convention includes provisions for resale royalty rights, which have been adopted by countries worldwide. However, Indonesia has yet to establish a framework for resale royalty rights, leading to suboptimal protection of economic rights for creators of painting works. This study aims to analyze the regulation of economic rights for the resale of painting works under Copyright Law in Indonesia, Germany, and Australia. Additionally, it seeks to identify the urgency of implementing royalty rights resale in the Indonesian Copyright Law. The research utilizes a normative legal approach with a statutory and comparative focus. The findings indicate that Indonesia currently lacks specific regulations for royalty rights resale within its Copyright Law. In contrast, Germany and Australia have incorporated the resale royalty right provisions of the Berne Convention into their respective Urheberrechtsgesetz 1965 and Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artist Act 2009. The creators of painting works deserve royalty rights on the resale of their works to enhance their well-being and secure benefits for their heirs. Therefore, it is crucial for Indonesia to adopt legal practices regarding royalty rights resale based on the experiences of Germany and Australia. Recognizing the advantages of implementing royalty rights resale, it becomes evident that such regulations are essential in Indonesia. To protect the economic rights of creators of painting works adequately, Indonesia should consider incorporating provisions for royalty rights resale in its copyright law reform. This will not only strengthen the legal protection of creators but also promote the growth of the artistic community in the country.","PeriodicalId":33754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Legal Reform","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Legal Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i2.68103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Berne Convention includes provisions for resale royalty rights, which have been adopted by countries worldwide. However, Indonesia has yet to establish a framework for resale royalty rights, leading to suboptimal protection of economic rights for creators of painting works. This study aims to analyze the regulation of economic rights for the resale of painting works under Copyright Law in Indonesia, Germany, and Australia. Additionally, it seeks to identify the urgency of implementing royalty rights resale in the Indonesian Copyright Law. The research utilizes a normative legal approach with a statutory and comparative focus. The findings indicate that Indonesia currently lacks specific regulations for royalty rights resale within its Copyright Law. In contrast, Germany and Australia have incorporated the resale royalty right provisions of the Berne Convention into their respective Urheberrechtsgesetz 1965 and Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artist Act 2009. The creators of painting works deserve royalty rights on the resale of their works to enhance their well-being and secure benefits for their heirs. Therefore, it is crucial for Indonesia to adopt legal practices regarding royalty rights resale based on the experiences of Germany and Australia. Recognizing the advantages of implementing royalty rights resale, it becomes evident that such regulations are essential in Indonesia. To protect the economic rights of creators of painting works adequately, Indonesia should consider incorporating provisions for royalty rights resale in its copyright law reform. This will not only strengthen the legal protection of creators but also promote the growth of the artistic community in the country.
印尼规范绘画版权转售使用权的迫切性(德国与澳大利亚比较研究)
《伯尔尼公约》包括转售特许权的规定,已被世界各国采用。然而,印尼尚未建立转售版税的框架,导致对绘画作品创作者经济权利的保护不够理想。本研究旨在分析印尼、德国、澳洲三国版权法对绘画作品转售经济权利的规制。此外,它试图确定在印度尼西亚版权法中实施特许权转售的紧迫性。本研究采用规范性的法律方法,以法定和比较为重点。调查结果表明,印尼目前在其《版权法》中缺乏对特许权使用费转售的具体规定。相比之下,德国和澳大利亚已将《伯尔尼公约》的转售版税规定纳入各自的Urheberrechtsgesetz 1965和《视觉艺术家转售版税法2009》。绘画作品的创作者应该对其作品的转售享有版税权,以提高他们的福祉,并确保其继承人的利益。因此,印尼在借鉴德国和澳大利亚经验的基础上,采取特许权转售的法律实践是至关重要的。认识到实施特许权转售的好处,很明显,这样的规定在印度尼西亚是必不可少的。为了充分保护绘画作品创作者的经济权利,印尼应考虑在版权法改革中纳入版税转售的规定。这不仅会加强对创作者的法律保护,也会促进国内艺术群体的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书