Business pedagogy: a qualitative analysis to inform library support

IF 1.8 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Ashley Ireland, Dana Statton Thompson, B. Bourke
{"title":"Business pedagogy: a qualitative analysis to inform library support","authors":"Ashley Ireland, Dana Statton Thompson, B. Bourke","doi":"10.1108/pmm-12-2019-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to illuminate business instructors' undergraduate pedagogical processes toward developing resources and services to support their teaching.,The authors recruited participants through purposeful sampling and collected data through semi-structured interviews. The transcriptions were coded using a grounded theory approach.,The findings of this study demonstrate that faculty are motivated to be good teachers and want to engage in opportunities to improve. However, lack of time and teaching with technology pose pedagogical learning curves for faculty. Institutional support for improving teaching is welcomed, but it may also be perceived as white noise against competing priorities and a deluge of information. Lastly, business, as a discipline, may uniquely use informational formats such as multimedia and case studies that may pose a challenge to traditional collection development.,The project was designed to be exploratory, small-scale and grounded in approach. This study does not purport to be statistically representative nor are the recommendations meant to be prescriptive.,Academic libraries should be more intentional about positioning subject librarians to provide suggestions for textbooks or other course materials, collecting, organizing and preserving case studies and multimedia and their relationships with publishers that use models that subvert collecting textbooks. Libraries should also partner with technology and pedagogy support units to offer cooperative programming when possible.,This study contributes to the fields of library and information studies, business and education by articulating the unique needs of instructors within the larger contexts of business pedagogy, and the evolving relationship between libraries and undergraduate teaching support.","PeriodicalId":44583,"journal":{"name":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","volume":"21 1","pages":"81-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/pmm-12-2019-0056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance Measurement and Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pmm-12-2019-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to illuminate business instructors' undergraduate pedagogical processes toward developing resources and services to support their teaching.,The authors recruited participants through purposeful sampling and collected data through semi-structured interviews. The transcriptions were coded using a grounded theory approach.,The findings of this study demonstrate that faculty are motivated to be good teachers and want to engage in opportunities to improve. However, lack of time and teaching with technology pose pedagogical learning curves for faculty. Institutional support for improving teaching is welcomed, but it may also be perceived as white noise against competing priorities and a deluge of information. Lastly, business, as a discipline, may uniquely use informational formats such as multimedia and case studies that may pose a challenge to traditional collection development.,The project was designed to be exploratory, small-scale and grounded in approach. This study does not purport to be statistically representative nor are the recommendations meant to be prescriptive.,Academic libraries should be more intentional about positioning subject librarians to provide suggestions for textbooks or other course materials, collecting, organizing and preserving case studies and multimedia and their relationships with publishers that use models that subvert collecting textbooks. Libraries should also partner with technology and pedagogy support units to offer cooperative programming when possible.,This study contributes to the fields of library and information studies, business and education by articulating the unique needs of instructors within the larger contexts of business pedagogy, and the evolving relationship between libraries and undergraduate teaching support.
商业教育学:图书馆支持的定性分析
本研究旨在阐明商业讲师在开发资源和服务以支持其教学的本科教学过程。作者通过有目的的抽样招募参与者,并通过半结构化访谈收集数据。转录使用接地理论方法编码。本研究的结果表明,教师有动力成为好老师,并希望利用机会提高自己。然而,缺乏时间和技术教学给教师带来了教学学习曲线。改善教学的机构支持是受欢迎的,但它也可能被视为对抗竞争优先事项和信息洪流的白噪音。最后,商业作为一门学科,可能会独特地使用信息格式,如多媒体和案例研究,这可能对传统的收集开发构成挑战。该项目的设计是探索性的、小规模的、接地气的。这项研究并不具有统计学上的代表性,也不意味着建议是规范性的。学术图书馆应该更有意识地定位学科图书馆员,为教科书或其他课程材料提供建议,收集、组织和保存案例研究和多媒体,以及他们与出版商的关系,这些出版商使用颠覆收集教科书的模式。图书馆还应与技术和教学支助单位合作,在可能的情况下提供合作方案。本研究通过阐明在更大的商业教育学背景下教师的独特需求,以及图书馆与本科教学支持之间不断发展的关系,对图书馆与信息研究、商业与教育领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Performance Measurement and Metrics
Performance Measurement and Metrics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: ■Quantitative and qualitative analysis ■Benchmarking ■The measurement and role of information in enhancing organizational effectiveness ■Quality techniques and quality improvement ■Training and education ■Methods for performance measurement and metrics ■Standard assessment tools ■Using emerging technologies ■Setting standards or service quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信