Delegitimizing Racialized Brands

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Ela Veresiu
{"title":"Delegitimizing Racialized Brands","authors":"Ela Veresiu","doi":"10.1086/722694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increased focus on racial justice in markets and society, the delegitimization of racialized brands employing racial stereotypes to enliven themselves remains unexplored. This study draws on media data and discursive (de)legitimization to compare the initial maintenance and eventual removal of a mainstream racialized brand name through public discourses in the popular press. Specifically, it unpacks how brands’ spokespeople and other professionals legitimized Gypsy Sauce in the German marketplace in 2013 only to delegitimize the controversial brand name in 2020. “Gypsy” is a racially charged and derogatory term for the self-designated Roma ethno-race. The critical discourse analysis reveals two commonly used delegitimizing discourses (antiracism and social tolerating) as direct responses to two dominant legitimizing discourses (romanticizing and market dynamicizing) for the racialized brand. This article concludes with consumer implications, branding recommendations, and future research directions on delegitimizing culturally insensitive brands.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"59 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Despite the increased focus on racial justice in markets and society, the delegitimization of racialized brands employing racial stereotypes to enliven themselves remains unexplored. This study draws on media data and discursive (de)legitimization to compare the initial maintenance and eventual removal of a mainstream racialized brand name through public discourses in the popular press. Specifically, it unpacks how brands’ spokespeople and other professionals legitimized Gypsy Sauce in the German marketplace in 2013 only to delegitimize the controversial brand name in 2020. “Gypsy” is a racially charged and derogatory term for the self-designated Roma ethno-race. The critical discourse analysis reveals two commonly used delegitimizing discourses (antiracism and social tolerating) as direct responses to two dominant legitimizing discourses (romanticizing and market dynamicizing) for the racialized brand. This article concludes with consumer implications, branding recommendations, and future research directions on delegitimizing culturally insensitive brands.
取消种族化品牌的合法性
尽管人们越来越关注市场和社会中的种族正义,但利用种族刻板印象来使自己活跃起来的种族化品牌的合法性仍未得到探讨。本研究利用媒体数据和话语(去)合法化来比较通过大众媒体的公共话语,主流种族化品牌名称的最初维护和最终移除。具体来说,它揭示了品牌代言人和其他专业人士如何在2013年将吉普赛酱在德国市场合法化,而在2020年将这个有争议的品牌名称合法化。“吉普赛人”是一个带有种族色彩的贬义词,指的是自称为罗姆人的少数民族。批判性话语分析揭示了两种常用的非合法化话语(反种族主义和社会宽容)作为对种族化品牌的两种主流合法化话语(浪漫化和市场动态化)的直接回应。这篇文章的结论是消费者的影响,品牌建议,以及未来的研究方向去合法化文化不敏感的品牌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信