When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
C. Meini
{"title":"When the selfing process goes wrong: Social-biofeedback, causal mechanisms, and pathological narcissism","authors":"C. Meini","doi":"10.4453/RIFP.2020.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical and social psychology) have further strengthened this constructivist perspective. Notably, Gergely and Watson’s social biofeedback model has been proposed as a central mechanism in the development of emotional introspection, which itself constitutes a crucial step in the process leading to a mature sense of self. In accordance with the social biofeedback model, it has been suggested that reiterated failures in biofeedback mechanisms predispose an individual to mental suffering. While borderline personality disorder and antisocial behavior have received the most attention, here I make a preliminary attempt to examine the impact of dysfunctional biofeedback on the pathogenesis of narcissism, suggesting that some central features of pathological narcissism may result from serious and reiterated disruptions in social biofeedback. This preliminary exploration aims to deepen our understanding of the origins of psychological suffering. In this sense, my effort could contribute to the construction of a causal model going beyond the purely categorical, atheoretical analysis of mental diseases typical of the diagnostic and statistical manuals. Keywords: Self; Self-ing Process; Social Biofeedback Model; Narcissism Il farsi e il disfarsi del se. Biofeedback sociale, meccanismi causali e narcisismo patologico Riassunto: La prospettiva costruttivista sullo sviluppo del se, efficacemente difesa da William James in opposizione all’innatismo di stampo cartesiano, e oggi ulteriormente avvalorata da numerosi dati empirici provenienti da diversi ambiti della psicologia (in particolare, psicologia dello sviluppo, clinica e sociale). Il modello del biofeedback sociale di Gergely e Watson e stato proposto quale meccanismo centrale nello sviluppo dell’introspezione emotiva. In accordo a tale modello, ripetuti gravi fallimenti del biofeedback predispongono al disturbo mentale, segnatamente al disturbo borderline di personalita e al comportamento antisociale. In questo saggio mi occupero di disturbo narcisistico di personalita, suggerendo che anche alcuni dei sintomi principali di questa patologia potrebbero derivare da disfunzioni gravi e reiterate del biofeedback. Nonostante la sua natura preliminare, la mia indagine si inscrive nell’alveo di quelle ricerche che mirano costruzione di un modello causale che vada oltre l’analisi puramente categoriale e ateoretica tipica dei manuali statistico-diagnostici. Parole chiave: Self; Identita personale; Social Biofeedback Model; Disturbo narcisistico di personalita","PeriodicalId":41707,"journal":{"name":"Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia","volume":"11 1","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4453/RIFP.2020.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In direct opposition to the dominant nativist perspective tracing back to Descartes, William James suggested that the sense of self is constructed through a never-ending process of reflexivity. In more recent years, empirical data from various psychological domains (notably developmental, clinical and social psychology) have further strengthened this constructivist perspective. Notably, Gergely and Watson’s social biofeedback model has been proposed as a central mechanism in the development of emotional introspection, which itself constitutes a crucial step in the process leading to a mature sense of self. In accordance with the social biofeedback model, it has been suggested that reiterated failures in biofeedback mechanisms predispose an individual to mental suffering. While borderline personality disorder and antisocial behavior have received the most attention, here I make a preliminary attempt to examine the impact of dysfunctional biofeedback on the pathogenesis of narcissism, suggesting that some central features of pathological narcissism may result from serious and reiterated disruptions in social biofeedback. This preliminary exploration aims to deepen our understanding of the origins of psychological suffering. In this sense, my effort could contribute to the construction of a causal model going beyond the purely categorical, atheoretical analysis of mental diseases typical of the diagnostic and statistical manuals. Keywords: Self; Self-ing Process; Social Biofeedback Model; Narcissism Il farsi e il disfarsi del se. Biofeedback sociale, meccanismi causali e narcisismo patologico Riassunto: La prospettiva costruttivista sullo sviluppo del se, efficacemente difesa da William James in opposizione all’innatismo di stampo cartesiano, e oggi ulteriormente avvalorata da numerosi dati empirici provenienti da diversi ambiti della psicologia (in particolare, psicologia dello sviluppo, clinica e sociale). Il modello del biofeedback sociale di Gergely e Watson e stato proposto quale meccanismo centrale nello sviluppo dell’introspezione emotiva. In accordo a tale modello, ripetuti gravi fallimenti del biofeedback predispongono al disturbo mentale, segnatamente al disturbo borderline di personalita e al comportamento antisociale. In questo saggio mi occupero di disturbo narcisistico di personalita, suggerendo che anche alcuni dei sintomi principali di questa patologia potrebbero derivare da disfunzioni gravi e reiterate del biofeedback. Nonostante la sua natura preliminare, la mia indagine si inscrive nell’alveo di quelle ricerche che mirano costruzione di un modello causale che vada oltre l’analisi puramente categoriale e ateoretica tipica dei manuali statistico-diagnostici. Parole chiave: Self; Identita personale; Social Biofeedback Model; Disturbo narcisistico di personalita
当自我过程出错:社会生物反馈、因果机制和病态自恋
摘要:威廉·詹姆斯(William James)与笛卡儿以来占主导地位的本土主义观点截然相反,认为自我意识是通过一个永无止境的反身性过程构建的。近年来,来自不同心理学领域(尤其是发展心理学、临床心理学和社会心理学)的经验数据进一步强化了这一建构主义观点。值得注意的是,Gergely和Watson的社会生物反馈模型被认为是情绪内省发展的核心机制,而情绪内省本身是导致成熟自我意识的关键一步。根据社会生物反馈模型,有人认为生物反馈机制的反复失败使个体容易遭受精神痛苦。虽然边缘型人格障碍和反社会行为受到了最多的关注,但在这里,我初步尝试研究功能失调的生物反馈对自恋发病机制的影响,表明病理性自恋的一些核心特征可能是由于社会生物反馈的严重破坏和反复破坏造成的。这一初步探索旨在加深我们对心理痛苦起源的理解。从这个意义上说,我的努力可以有助于建立一个因果模型,超越纯粹的分类,对精神疾病的理论分析,典型的诊断和统计手册。关键词:自我;Self-ing过程;社会生物反馈模型;自恋会让你更自恋,也会让你更自恋。生物反馈社会,机制,因果关系,自恋病理学,心理学,心理学,心理学,心理学,心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学,心理学心理学。生物反馈社会模型通常是由沃森提出的,他提出了一种生物反馈社会的机制。根据一个故事模型,成熟的重力下降包括生物反馈的心理前干扰、信号干扰、边缘性人格干扰和反社会行为。在questo saggio mi occupero di disturbo narcisistico di personalita suggerendo格瓦拉传递alcuni一些sintomi principali di, patologia potrebbero derivare da disfunzioni gravi e重申德尔生物反馈。非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始、非自然初始。假释官:自我;Identita personale;社会生物反馈模型;人格自恋紊乱症
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信