The evaluation of Safe and Well visits as part of the prevention activities of fire and Rescue Services in England

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
K. Lakoma, P. Murphy
{"title":"The evaluation of Safe and Well visits as part of the prevention activities of fire and Rescue Services in England","authors":"K. Lakoma, P. Murphy","doi":"10.1108/ijes-09-2022-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSafe and Well visits are the primary preventative vehicle now used by all Fire and Rescue Services in England. The purpose of this paper is to examine their recent development to identify notable practice and potential improvements.Design/methodology/approachA literature review and archival document analysis have been supplemented by data and information from the evaluation of a case study at Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service.FindingsThere is considerable scope to improve Safe and Well visits, although individual services and the sector are not yet able to implement effective benchmarking across services or commission a more appropriate evaluation methodology such as a social return on investment.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is situationally bound to England, although there may be transferable lessons to other services and jurisdictions.Practical implicationsPotential future improvements are identified and recommended at local and national levels, both in the data and information available, and for policy, operationalisation and public assurance.Originality/valueAlthough a small number of professional reviews have been undertaken, the authors are not aware of any academic evaluation of Safe and Well visits since they superseded the previous Home Fire Safety Checks.","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijes-09-2022-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSafe and Well visits are the primary preventative vehicle now used by all Fire and Rescue Services in England. The purpose of this paper is to examine their recent development to identify notable practice and potential improvements.Design/methodology/approachA literature review and archival document analysis have been supplemented by data and information from the evaluation of a case study at Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service.FindingsThere is considerable scope to improve Safe and Well visits, although individual services and the sector are not yet able to implement effective benchmarking across services or commission a more appropriate evaluation methodology such as a social return on investment.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is situationally bound to England, although there may be transferable lessons to other services and jurisdictions.Practical implicationsPotential future improvements are identified and recommended at local and national levels, both in the data and information available, and for policy, operationalisation and public assurance.Originality/valueAlthough a small number of professional reviews have been undertaken, the authors are not aware of any academic evaluation of Safe and Well visits since they superseded the previous Home Fire Safety Checks.
作为英格兰消防救援服务预防活动的一部分,对安全和健康访问的评估
目的安全和健康访问是目前英格兰所有消防救援服务部门使用的主要预防工具。本文的目的是考察它们的最新发展,以确定值得注意的实践和潜在的改进。设计/方法/方法诺丁汉郡消防救援局案例研究评估的数据和信息补充了文献综述和档案文件分析。发现尽管个别服务和行业尚未能够在服务中实施有效的基准测试,或委托使用更合适的评估方法,如社会投资回报率,但仍有相当大的空间来改进安全和健康访问。研究局限性/含义该研究与英国的情况有关,尽管可能会将经验教训转移到其他服务和司法管辖区。实际影响在地方和国家层面,从可用的数据和信息,以及政策、运营和公共保证方面,确定并建议未来的潜在改进。原创性/价值尽管已经进行了少量的专业审查,但作者并不知道对安全和健康访问的任何学术评估,因为它们取代了以前的家庭消防安全检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信