"It was a mistake": Abolitionism, Revision, and Mark Twain's "A Scrap of Curious History"

Pub Date : 2020-11-19 DOI:10.5325/marktwaij.18.1.0065
Ohge
{"title":"\"It was a mistake\": Abolitionism, Revision, and Mark Twain's \"A Scrap of Curious History\"","authors":"Ohge","doi":"10.5325/marktwaij.18.1.0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Mark Twain did not publish any significant reflections on abolitionism in his lifetime, yet he did leave in his papers \"A Scrap of Curious History,\" an unfinished attempt to write fiction about abolitionist activity in antebellum Missouri that was initiated not by memory but by his witnessing a backlash to anarchist uprisings in France in 1894. His biographer Albert Bigelow Paine published a revised and expurgated version of \"A Scrap of Curious History\" in Harper's Monthly a few years after Clemens's death, but existing commentary on the sketch has been minimal and has relied on Paine's bowdlerized text, not on the surviving manuscript. Paine's changes—including his writing a conclusion to the piece—deviated from Mark Twain's intentions to write a dramatic sketch, ponderously open-ended and blunt, that examined the anxieties underlying radical politics and their relation to justice, terrorism, and social progress.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/marktwaij.18.1.0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Mark Twain did not publish any significant reflections on abolitionism in his lifetime, yet he did leave in his papers "A Scrap of Curious History," an unfinished attempt to write fiction about abolitionist activity in antebellum Missouri that was initiated not by memory but by his witnessing a backlash to anarchist uprisings in France in 1894. His biographer Albert Bigelow Paine published a revised and expurgated version of "A Scrap of Curious History" in Harper's Monthly a few years after Clemens's death, but existing commentary on the sketch has been minimal and has relied on Paine's bowdlerized text, not on the surviving manuscript. Paine's changes—including his writing a conclusion to the piece—deviated from Mark Twain's intentions to write a dramatic sketch, ponderously open-ended and blunt, that examined the anxieties underlying radical politics and their relation to justice, terrorism, and social progress.
分享
查看原文
“这是个错误”:废奴主义、修正与马克·吐温的《一小段奇特的历史》
摘要:马克·吐温一生中没有发表任何关于废奴主义的重要反思,但他确实在他的论文《好奇历史的碎片》中留下了这篇未完成的关于南北战争前密苏里州废奴主义活动的小说,这篇小说不是由记忆引发的,而是由他目睹1894年法国无政府主义起义的反弹引发的。克莱门斯去世几年后,他的传记作家阿尔伯特·毕格罗-潘恩在《哈珀月刊》上发表了《好奇历史的碎片》的修订版和删节版,但对该草图的现有评论很少,而且依赖于潘恩的删节文本,而不是幸存的手稿。潘恩的改变——包括他为这篇文章写了一个结论——偏离了马克·吐温写一个戏剧性的小品的意图,这个小品沉重而坦率,审视了激进政治背后的焦虑,以及它们与正义、恐怖主义和社会进步的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信