The role of competition authorities in protecting freedom of speech: the PKN Orlen/Polska Press case

Q2 Social Sciences
Cezary Banasiński, Marcin Rojszczak
{"title":"The role of competition authorities in protecting freedom of speech: the PKN Orlen/Polska Press case","authors":"Cezary Banasiński, Marcin Rojszczak","doi":"10.1080/17441056.2021.2003999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For more than 30 years, EU institutions and Member States have been engaged in a dialogue on what measures might be considered appropriate to protect media pluralism. With the increasing globalization of digital services, national legislatures have increasingly recognized the need to actively shape the media market by controlling mergers taking place within it. The aim of this article is to discuss the PKN Orlen/Polska Press case and to explain the role of EU competition authorities in protecting media pluralism. The analysis also seeks to determine whether – and based on which competencies – the EU should counter systemic threats to media independence in Member States. The Polish experience may also be helpful in view of work currently underway on the new Media Freedom Act – EU legislation intended to counteract the growing monopolization of media and ensure its protection as a central pillar of democracy.","PeriodicalId":52118,"journal":{"name":"European Competition Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"424 - 457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Competition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2021.2003999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT For more than 30 years, EU institutions and Member States have been engaged in a dialogue on what measures might be considered appropriate to protect media pluralism. With the increasing globalization of digital services, national legislatures have increasingly recognized the need to actively shape the media market by controlling mergers taking place within it. The aim of this article is to discuss the PKN Orlen/Polska Press case and to explain the role of EU competition authorities in protecting media pluralism. The analysis also seeks to determine whether – and based on which competencies – the EU should counter systemic threats to media independence in Member States. The Polish experience may also be helpful in view of work currently underway on the new Media Freedom Act – EU legislation intended to counteract the growing monopolization of media and ensure its protection as a central pillar of democracy.
竞争当局在保护言论自由方面的作用:波兰PKN Orlen/波兰报业案
摘要30多年来,欧盟机构和成员国一直在就保护媒体多元化的适当措施进行对话。随着数字服务的日益全球化,各国立法机构越来越认识到有必要通过控制媒体市场内部的合并来积极塑造媒体市场。本文旨在讨论PKN Orlen/Polska Press案,并解释欧盟竞争主管部门在保护媒体多元化方面的作用。该分析还试图确定欧盟是否应该应对对成员国媒体独立性的系统性威胁,以及基于哪些能力。鉴于目前正在制定新的《媒体自由法》,波兰的经验也可能有所帮助。《媒体自由法案》是欧盟的一项立法,旨在对抗日益严重的媒体垄断,并确保将其作为民主的核心支柱加以保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Competition Journal
European Competition Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The European Competition Journal publishes outstanding scholarly articles relating to European competition law and economics. Its mission is to help foster learning and debate about how European competition law and policy can continue to develop in an economically rational way. Articles published in the Journal are subject to rigorous peer review by leading experts from around Europe. Topics include: -Vertical and Conglomerate Mergers -Enlargement of the Union - the ramifications for Competition Policy -Unilateral and Coordinated Effects in Merger Control -Modernisation of European Competition law -Cartels and Leniency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信