“CONSCIENCE ADHERENTS” REVISITED: NON-LGBT PRIDE PARADE PARTICIPANTS*

IF 1.3 2区社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY

Mobilization Pub Date : 2018-03-01 DOI:10.17813/1086-671X-23-1-83

Mattias Wahlström, Abby Peterson, Magnus Wennerhag

引用次数: 3

Abstract

Foundation stones in the resource mobilization theory of social movements are the notions of “conscience adherents” and “conscience constituents,” first introduced by McCarthy and Zald in 1977. In this article, we revisit the concept of conscience adherent, by applying it to individuals and groups that are direct supporters of an LGBT movement, but who do not stand to directly benefit from the success should the movement accomplish its goals. Using quantitative data collected during Pride parades in Stockholm, Haarlem, London, and Warsaw, we analyze the group of participants who reported that they were lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender and compare them to heterosexual and gender-conforming participants, identifying factors that explain why people in the latter category participate in Pride parades. We argue that experiences of discrimination, knowing people from the beneficiary group, and/or subscribing to general principles of justice, contribute to conscience adherent participation. Furthermore, ba...

查看原文本刊更多论文

“良心拥护者”被重新审视:非lgbt游行参与者*

社会运动资源动员理论的基石是麦卡锡和扎尔德于1977年首次提出的“良心追随者”和“良心选民”的概念。在这篇文章中，我们重新审视了良心追随者的概念，将其应用于LGBT运动的直接支持者，但如果运动实现目标，他们不会直接从成功中受益。利用斯德哥尔摩、哈勒姆、伦敦和华沙骄傲游行期间收集的定量数据，我们分析了报告自己是女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋或变性人的参与者群体，并将他们与异性恋和符合性别的参与者进行了比较，确定了解释后一类人为什么参加骄傲游行的因素。我们认为，歧视的经历，了解受益群体的人，和/或赞同正义的一般原则，有助于良心坚持参与。此外，巴。。。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Mobilization SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Mobilization: An International Quarterly is the premier journal of research specializing in social movements, protests, insurgencies, revolutions, and other forms of contentious politics. Mobilization was first published in 1996 to fill the need for a scholarly review of research that focused exclusively with social movements, protest and collective action. Mobilization is fully peer-reviewed and widely indexed. A 2003 study, when Mobilization was published semiannually, showed that its citation index rate was 1.286, which placed it among the top ten sociology journals. Today, Mobilization is published four times a year, in March, June, September, and December. The editorial board is composed of thirty internationally recognized scholars from political science, sociology and social psychology. The goal of Mobilization is to provide a forum for global, scholarly dialogue. It is currently distributed to the top international research libraries and read by the most engaged scholars in the field. We hope that through its wide distribution, different research strategies and theoretical/conceptual approaches will be shared among the global community of social movement scholars, encouraging a collaborative process that will further the development of a cumulative social science.