An ablative for the Greeks?

IF 0.2 4区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Historiographia Linguistica Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1075/HL.00067.ROO

R. V. Rooy

引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, I discuss a grammar dispute that took place between Philipp Nicodemus Frischlin and Martin Crusius in Tübingen in the winter of 1585/1586. I argue that their diverging views on the ablative case reflect a disagreement on two levels, in addition to their obvious personal rivalry: (1) the foundations of grammar, which Frischlin based on meaning rather than form, following J. C. Scaliger, and (2) contrasting attitudes toward the Greek people and heritage. Additionally, I discuss Frischlin’s views on the article and the optative mood, while also tracing a popular misquote from Scaliger’s work to Frischlin.

查看原文本刊更多论文

希腊人的烧蚀?

在这篇文章中，我讨论了1585/1586年冬天在宾根发生的菲利普·尼科德摩斯·弗里施林和马丁·克鲁修斯之间的语法争论。我认为，除了他们明显的个人竞争之外，他们对烧蚀格的不同看法反映了两个层面上的分歧:(1)语法的基础，弗里斯克林基于意义而不是形式，遵循J. C。(2)对希腊人民和遗产的不同态度。此外，我还讨论了Frischlin对文章和选择语气的看法，同时也追溯了一个流行的错误引用，从Scaliger的工作到Frischlin。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Historiographia Linguistica Multiple-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Historiographia Linguistica (HL) serves the ever growing community of scholars interested in the history of the sciences concerned with language such as linguistics, philology, anthropology, sociology, pedagogy, psychology, neurology, and other disciplines. Central objectives of HL are the critical presentation of the origin and development of particular ideas, concepts, methods, schools of thought or trends, and the discussion of the methodological and philosophical foundations of a historiography of the language sciences, including its relationship with the history and philosophy of science. HL is published in 3 issues per year of about 450 pages altogether.