The rise and fall of MapQuest

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
R. Wilken
{"title":"The rise and fall of MapQuest","authors":"R. Wilken","doi":"10.1080/24701475.2022.2057752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article builds an historical account of the rise and fall of US mapping firm MapQuest. It charts the emergence and rapid rise of MapQuest as a popular early provider of online maps – detailing notable innovations, key developments, and successive ownership changes, and the significance of these for MapQuest – and it documents its equally rapid fall. The article draws on political economy of communication (and geographic political economy) approaches in its analysis of MapQuest. This critical framework is valuable for the way that it draws attention to the different stakeholders involved in controlling and commercialising MapQuest’s applications for web-based and mobile devices, and the structural factors that shape and influence the industries in which it operates. From this analysis, it is argued that a range of factors led to MapQuest’s dramatically diminished market share within the field of online mapping. These included: a lack of revenue generation opportunities; significant map data quality issues; loss of consumer visibility due to search algorithm interference; and a reactive rather than proactive approach to innovation under consecutive owners. This account of MapQuest is important in two ways. First, while MapQuest is a significant firm in the history of contemporary digital mapping, particularly as a pioneer of online distributed mapping, the firm’s history and its contribution to digital mapping remains under-represented in internet histories scholarship. Second, this article contributes to growing interest in and deepening critical understanding of platform precarity, asking: What becomes of platforms when they falter? And what are the factors that contribute to their decline?","PeriodicalId":52252,"journal":{"name":"Internet Histories","volume":"6 1","pages":"172 - 190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2022.2057752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article builds an historical account of the rise and fall of US mapping firm MapQuest. It charts the emergence and rapid rise of MapQuest as a popular early provider of online maps – detailing notable innovations, key developments, and successive ownership changes, and the significance of these for MapQuest – and it documents its equally rapid fall. The article draws on political economy of communication (and geographic political economy) approaches in its analysis of MapQuest. This critical framework is valuable for the way that it draws attention to the different stakeholders involved in controlling and commercialising MapQuest’s applications for web-based and mobile devices, and the structural factors that shape and influence the industries in which it operates. From this analysis, it is argued that a range of factors led to MapQuest’s dramatically diminished market share within the field of online mapping. These included: a lack of revenue generation opportunities; significant map data quality issues; loss of consumer visibility due to search algorithm interference; and a reactive rather than proactive approach to innovation under consecutive owners. This account of MapQuest is important in two ways. First, while MapQuest is a significant firm in the history of contemporary digital mapping, particularly as a pioneer of online distributed mapping, the firm’s history and its contribution to digital mapping remains under-represented in internet histories scholarship. Second, this article contributes to growing interest in and deepening critical understanding of platform precarity, asking: What becomes of platforms when they falter? And what are the factors that contribute to their decline?
MapQuest的兴衰
摘要本文对美国地图公司MapQuest的兴衰进行了历史叙述。它描绘了MapQuest作为早期流行的在线地图提供商的出现和快速崛起,详细描述了显著的创新、关键发展和连续的所有权变更,以及这些对MapQuest的重要性,并记录了其同样迅速的衰落。本文在分析MapQuest时借鉴了传播的政治经济学(以及地理政治经济学)方法。这一关键框架很有价值,因为它吸引了人们对参与控制和商业化MapQuest基于网络和移动设备的应用程序的不同利益相关者的关注,以及塑造和影响其运营行业的结构因素。根据这一分析,有人认为,一系列因素导致MapQuest在在线地图领域的市场份额急剧下降。这些问题包括:缺乏创收机会;重大地图数据质量问题;由于搜索算法干扰而导致的消费者可见性损失;以及在连续所有者的领导下采取被动而非主动的创新方法。MapQuest的这篇报道在两个方面很重要。首先,尽管MapQuest是当代数字地图史上的一家重要公司,特别是作为在线分布式地图的先驱,但该公司的历史及其对数字地图的贡献在互联网历史学术中仍然没有得到充分的体现。其次,这篇文章有助于人们对平台不稳定性越来越感兴趣,并加深对其的批判性理解,提出问题:当平台摇摇欲坠时,会发生什么?是什么因素导致了它们的下降?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet Histories
Internet Histories Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信