Role of chest wall perforator flaps in breast-conserving surgery as a volume-replacement oncoplastic procedure

IF 0.1 Q4 SURGERY
Mohammad M. Soffar, I. Salem, Nasser A. Ghozlan, Mahmoud A. Alhussini
{"title":"Role of chest wall perforator flaps in breast-conserving surgery as a volume-replacement oncoplastic procedure","authors":"Mohammad M. Soffar, I. Salem, Nasser A. Ghozlan, Mahmoud A. Alhussini","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_263_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Partial breast reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) is a recent technique used by breast surgeons, mainly for lateral defects with a relatively large volume of excision in small-sized to medium-sized breast. We report our experience of CWPF in breast reconstruction with surgical details, complications, different locations of the tumor, and outcomes. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational cohort study on 20 patients who had undergone breast-conservation surgery plus CWPF reconstruction [lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap, lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap, anterior intercostal artery perforator flap, and thoracodorsal artery perforator flap]. A survey was done to analyze patient satisfaction at about 6 months after completion of radiotherapy. Results LICAP flap was used in 30% of the patients, anterior intercostal artery perforator flap was used in another 30%, whereas thoracodorsal artery perforator flap was used in 25% of the patients. A combination between LTAP and LICAP was used in 10% of the studied patients, and LTAP alone was used in only 5% of the cases. Regarding the complications, there was no incidence of total or partial flap loss in this series. Only minor complications were reported. Patients’ satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire, which showed acceptable patient satisfaction. Conclusion CWPF procedures show good outcomes in partial breast reconstruction in terms of oncological safety and patient satisfaction, extending the options for breast conservation to many patients who would otherwise require mastectomy.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":"1730 - 1737"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_263_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Partial breast reconstruction using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) is a recent technique used by breast surgeons, mainly for lateral defects with a relatively large volume of excision in small-sized to medium-sized breast. We report our experience of CWPF in breast reconstruction with surgical details, complications, different locations of the tumor, and outcomes. Patients and methods This was a prospective observational cohort study on 20 patients who had undergone breast-conservation surgery plus CWPF reconstruction [lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) flap, lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap, anterior intercostal artery perforator flap, and thoracodorsal artery perforator flap]. A survey was done to analyze patient satisfaction at about 6 months after completion of radiotherapy. Results LICAP flap was used in 30% of the patients, anterior intercostal artery perforator flap was used in another 30%, whereas thoracodorsal artery perforator flap was used in 25% of the patients. A combination between LTAP and LICAP was used in 10% of the studied patients, and LTAP alone was used in only 5% of the cases. Regarding the complications, there was no incidence of total or partial flap loss in this series. Only minor complications were reported. Patients’ satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire, which showed acceptable patient satisfaction. Conclusion CWPF procedures show good outcomes in partial breast reconstruction in terms of oncological safety and patient satisfaction, extending the options for breast conservation to many patients who would otherwise require mastectomy.
胸壁穿支皮瓣在保乳手术中的作用
背景胸壁穿支皮瓣(CWPF)部分乳房重建是近年来乳房外科医生应用的一项技术,主要用于小到中型乳房的侧向缺损,切除量相对较大。我们报告CWPF在乳房重建术中的经验,包括手术细节、并发症、肿瘤的不同位置和结果。患者和方法本研究是一项前瞻性观察队列研究,对20例行保乳手术加CWPF重建[外侧肋间动脉穿支(LICAP)瓣、外侧胸动脉穿支(LTAP)瓣、前肋间动脉穿支瓣和胸背动脉穿支瓣]的患者进行研究。对放疗结束后约6个月的患者满意度进行调查分析。结果LICAP皮瓣占30%,前肋间动脉穿支皮瓣占30%,胸背动脉穿支皮瓣占25%。10%的研究患者联合使用LTAP和LICAP,仅5%的病例单独使用LTAP。在并发症方面,本系列中没有发生皮瓣全部或部分丢失。仅报道轻微并发症。采用问卷评估患者满意度,患者满意度为可接受。结论在肿瘤安全性和患者满意度方面,CWPF手术在部分乳房重建中表现出良好的效果,为许多需要乳房切除术的患者提供了保留乳房的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信