Pre-operative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of complex spinal deformities: What do we know so far?: A systematic review

Q4 Medicine
G. Pratheep, V. Viswanathan, S. Manoharan
{"title":"Pre-operative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of complex spinal deformities: What do we know so far?: A systematic review","authors":"G. Pratheep, V. Viswanathan, S. Manoharan","doi":"10.4103/isj.isj_26_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spinal deformity surgeries are complex procedures associated with a high risk of complications. Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is a useful option that provides a gradual traction force to aid in deformity correction. Though its benefits are well-acknowledged, there still exist major ambiguities regarding its role in the management of complex spinal deformities. We performed a systematic review of the electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane on November 12, 2021 to identify relevant articles on HGT; to analyze the existing literature on pre-operative HGT; and to compare the existing protocols for HGT in spinal deformity patients, its varied effects on the radiological parameters and general health status of the patients, and its associated complications. Among the 284 articles available in the literature, 34 articles were finally included and a total of 1151 patients [mean age, 14.6 years] were analyzed. Mean pre-traction coronal Cobb angle of 107° (72°–140.7°) was reduced by 24.8% [to a mean of 80.5° (42°–120.2°)] following HGT. Mean pre- and post-traction sagittal Cobb angles were 88° (56°–134.7°) and 65.4° (36°–113°; a reduction by 25.7%), respectively. Following HGT, mean body weight and body mass index (BMI) of patients improved by 7.2% and 9.1%, respectively. Mean improvement in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume has been reported to be 14.5% and 13.9%, respectively. Pre-operative HGT is a useful option in the treatment of spinal deformities. It aids in reducing curve magnitude and provides optimal time for improving general condition (pulmonary and nutritional status) of patients pre-operatively. It is a safe procedure with 2.1% neurological and 11.6% non-neurological complication rates.","PeriodicalId":34652,"journal":{"name":"Indian Spine Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"65 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/isj.isj_26_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal deformity surgeries are complex procedures associated with a high risk of complications. Halo-gravity traction (HGT) is a useful option that provides a gradual traction force to aid in deformity correction. Though its benefits are well-acknowledged, there still exist major ambiguities regarding its role in the management of complex spinal deformities. We performed a systematic review of the electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane on November 12, 2021 to identify relevant articles on HGT; to analyze the existing literature on pre-operative HGT; and to compare the existing protocols for HGT in spinal deformity patients, its varied effects on the radiological parameters and general health status of the patients, and its associated complications. Among the 284 articles available in the literature, 34 articles were finally included and a total of 1151 patients [mean age, 14.6 years] were analyzed. Mean pre-traction coronal Cobb angle of 107° (72°–140.7°) was reduced by 24.8% [to a mean of 80.5° (42°–120.2°)] following HGT. Mean pre- and post-traction sagittal Cobb angles were 88° (56°–134.7°) and 65.4° (36°–113°; a reduction by 25.7%), respectively. Following HGT, mean body weight and body mass index (BMI) of patients improved by 7.2% and 9.1%, respectively. Mean improvement in forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume has been reported to be 14.5% and 13.9%, respectively. Pre-operative HGT is a useful option in the treatment of spinal deformities. It aids in reducing curve magnitude and provides optimal time for improving general condition (pulmonary and nutritional status) of patients pre-operatively. It is a safe procedure with 2.1% neurological and 11.6% non-neurological complication rates.
术前halo-gravity牵引治疗复杂脊柱畸形:到目前为止我们知道些什么?:系统回顾
脊柱畸形手术是一项复杂的手术,并发症的风险很高。晕重力牵引(HGT)是一种有用的选择,它提供逐渐的牵引力来帮助畸形矫正。虽然它的好处是公认的,但它在复杂脊柱畸形治疗中的作用仍然存在主要的模糊性。我们于2021年11月12日对EMBASE、MEDLINE、PubMed和Cochrane等电子数据库进行了系统综述,以确定与HGT相关的文章;分析术前HGT的现有文献;并比较脊柱畸形患者HGT的现有方案,其对患者放射学参数和一般健康状况的不同影响及其相关并发症。在可查文献284篇中,最终纳入34篇,共分析1151例患者,平均年龄14.6岁。牵引前冠状Cobb角平均为107°(72°-140.7°),HGT后降低24.8%[平均为80.5°(42°-120.2°)]。牵引前后矢状Cobb角分别为88°(56°- 134.7°)和65.4°(36°- 113°);分别减少25.7%)。HGT后,患者的平均体重和身体质量指数(BMI)分别改善7.2%和9.1%。据报道,用力肺活量和用力呼气量的平均改善分别为14.5%和13.9%。术前HGT是治疗脊柱畸形的有效选择。它有助于降低曲线幅度,并为改善术前患者的一般状况(肺和营养状况)提供最佳时间。这是一种安全的手术,神经系统并发症发生率为2.1%,非神经系统并发症发生率为11.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Spine Journal
Indian Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信