Service encounter and value co-creation in fundraising activities at the NPO sector

IF 3.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Renata V. Klafke, Andrés Barrios, S. Didonet
{"title":"Service encounter and value co-creation in fundraising activities at the NPO sector","authors":"Renata V. Klafke, Andrés Barrios, S. Didonet","doi":"10.1108/jsm-06-2022-0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nFundraising plays a critical role in the success of non-profit organizations (hereafter NPOs). This study aims to propose to analyze fundraising from a service-dominant logic, specifically from a service ecosystem approach, to understand the different entities and interactions involved in this activity, as well as the types of value that emerge from them.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA cross-case study was developed using three health-care Brazilian NPOs. Data collection methods were performed to build each case, including observation of NPOs’ telemarketing staff interaction with donors and long interviews with their marketing managers. Data analysis involved applying the service ecosystem framework to each NPO and contrasting them.\n\n\nFindings\nFirst, the findings revealed the way in which religious, political and child-rearing institutions integrate into citizenship ideals that permeate both NPOs’ and donors’ attitudes and behaviors. Second, five different fundraising interactions (emotional, religious, political, influencer and empathetic) in which NPOs and donors pool their resources to co-create value are presented. Third, how the outcomes of fundraising interactions manifest for NPOs in the form of financial (money and time) and social value (social legitimation) and for teleworkers and donors in the form of emotional value (joy and relatedness) are identified.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper used a service ecosystem approach to analyze a new service context “fundraising,” which has been scarcely discussed in the literature. The findings show how macro-level institutions work together for fundraising. Five different fundraising interactions were identified, linking the communication with the service experience literature. Finally, the findings identify fundraising’s different value outcomes extending traditional approaches for evaluating this activity.\n","PeriodicalId":48294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Services Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Services Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-06-2022-0211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Fundraising plays a critical role in the success of non-profit organizations (hereafter NPOs). This study aims to propose to analyze fundraising from a service-dominant logic, specifically from a service ecosystem approach, to understand the different entities and interactions involved in this activity, as well as the types of value that emerge from them. Design/methodology/approach A cross-case study was developed using three health-care Brazilian NPOs. Data collection methods were performed to build each case, including observation of NPOs’ telemarketing staff interaction with donors and long interviews with their marketing managers. Data analysis involved applying the service ecosystem framework to each NPO and contrasting them. Findings First, the findings revealed the way in which religious, political and child-rearing institutions integrate into citizenship ideals that permeate both NPOs’ and donors’ attitudes and behaviors. Second, five different fundraising interactions (emotional, religious, political, influencer and empathetic) in which NPOs and donors pool their resources to co-create value are presented. Third, how the outcomes of fundraising interactions manifest for NPOs in the form of financial (money and time) and social value (social legitimation) and for teleworkers and donors in the form of emotional value (joy and relatedness) are identified. Originality/value This paper used a service ecosystem approach to analyze a new service context “fundraising,” which has been scarcely discussed in the literature. The findings show how macro-level institutions work together for fundraising. Five different fundraising interactions were identified, linking the communication with the service experience literature. Finally, the findings identify fundraising’s different value outcomes extending traditional approaches for evaluating this activity.
非营利组织筹款活动中的服务相遇与价值共创
目的筹集资金对非营利组织(以下简称非营利组织)的成功起着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在从服务主导逻辑,特别是服务生态系统方法来分析筹资,以了解参与这一活动的不同实体和互动,以及由此产生的价值类型。设计/方法/方法利用三名巴西保健非营利组织开展了一项跨案例研究。采用数据收集方法构建每个案例,包括观察非营利组织电话营销人员与捐赠者的互动,以及与营销经理的长时间访谈。数据分析包括将服务生态系统框架应用于每个NPO并对其进行对比。研究结果首先,研究结果揭示了宗教、政治和育儿机构如何融入公民理想,这些理想渗透到非营利组织和捐赠者的态度和行为中。其次,介绍了五种不同的筹款互动(情感、宗教、政治、影响者和同理心),NPO和捐赠者在这些互动中汇集资源,共同创造价值。第三,确定了非营利组织筹款互动的结果如何以财务(金钱和时间)和社会价值(社会合法化)的形式表现出来,以及远程工作者和捐赠者的筹款互动结果如何以情感价值(快乐和相关性)的形式体现出来。独创性/价值本文采用服务生态系统的方法来分析一个新的服务背景“筹款”,这在文献中几乎没有讨论过。研究结果显示了宏观层面的机构是如何合作筹集资金的。确定了五种不同的筹款互动,将沟通与服务经验文献联系起来。最后,研究结果确定了筹资的不同价值结果,扩展了评估这一活动的传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
20.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: ■Customer policy and service ■Marketing of services ■Marketing planning ■Service marketing abroad ■Service quality Capturing and retaining customers in a service industry is a vastly different activity to its product-based counterpart. The fickle nature of today"s consumer is a vital factor in understanding the factors which determine successful holding of market share - and the intense competition within the sector means practitioners must keep pace with new developments if they are to outwit competitors and develop customer loyalty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信