Assessment of pain in preschoolers (aged 3-7): A scoping review of existing instruments

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Kontakt Pub Date : 2021-11-11 DOI:10.32725/kont.2021.048
P. Kašparová, Petra Mandysova
{"title":"Assessment of pain in preschoolers (aged 3-7): A scoping review of existing instruments","authors":"P. Kašparová, Petra Mandysova","doi":"10.32725/kont.2021.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the available scientific knowledge on the assessment of pain in preschool children (aged 3–7). The information obtained will provide a basis for further research. Methods: The data were collected with the help of keywords by PCC and using Boolean operators that were searched for in scientific electronics databases. The data were collected using keywords that were selected based on a research question and targeted at a specific population, concept and context. Four scientific databases were included: PubMed, ProQuest, OVID, EBSCOhost. Results: A total of 243 articles were identified, plus another 10 records were identified from the reference list of retrieved articles. After analysis, 51 articles were subjected to a critical analysis and 14 studies were selected for final use for the scoping review. Conclusions: A literature review confirmed that the topic of pain assessment in childhood is becoming increasingly important. All the presented pain assessment tools assess pain in different ways, but always with the same goal: to properly assess a child’s pain and then treat it as best as possible. Particularly with young children, it is advisable to include more methods of pain assessment and to assess more aspects of pain to provide them with the right treatment.","PeriodicalId":17818,"journal":{"name":"Kontakt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kontakt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2021.048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the available scientific knowledge on the assessment of pain in preschool children (aged 3–7). The information obtained will provide a basis for further research. Methods: The data were collected with the help of keywords by PCC and using Boolean operators that were searched for in scientific electronics databases. The data were collected using keywords that were selected based on a research question and targeted at a specific population, concept and context. Four scientific databases were included: PubMed, ProQuest, OVID, EBSCOhost. Results: A total of 243 articles were identified, plus another 10 records were identified from the reference list of retrieved articles. After analysis, 51 articles were subjected to a critical analysis and 14 studies were selected for final use for the scoping review. Conclusions: A literature review confirmed that the topic of pain assessment in childhood is becoming increasingly important. All the presented pain assessment tools assess pain in different ways, but always with the same goal: to properly assess a child’s pain and then treat it as best as possible. Particularly with young children, it is advisable to include more methods of pain assessment and to assess more aspects of pain to provide them with the right treatment.
学龄前儿童(3-7岁)疼痛评估:对现有仪器的范围审查
目的:本研究的目的是评估学龄前儿童(3-7岁)疼痛评估的现有科学知识。所获得的信息将为进一步研究提供基础。方法:利用PCC关键字和在科学电子数据库中搜索的布尔算子收集数据。数据是使用基于研究问题选择的关键词收集的,这些关键词针对特定人群、概念和背景。包括四个科学数据库:PubMed、ProQuest、OVID、EBSCOhost。结果:共鉴定出243篇文章,另外从检索到的文章的参考列表中鉴定出10条记录。分析后,对51篇文章进行了批判性分析,并选择了14项研究作为范围审查的最终用途。结论:一项文献综述证实,儿童疼痛评估的主题越来越重要。所有提供的疼痛评估工具都以不同的方式评估疼痛,但始终有着相同的目标:正确评估孩子的疼痛,然后尽可能最好地治疗。特别是对于年幼的儿童,建议包括更多的疼痛评估方法,并评估疼痛的更多方面,为他们提供正确的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kontakt
Kontakt Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles are published in two sections: 1. The nursing section focuses on the support of nursing via the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based peer reviewed findings. The section serves as a forum for the exchange of knowledge relating to the education of nurses, the exchange of knowledge and skills in clinical nursing, the development of nursing concepts and innovation in health policy. It deals with the legal and ethical issues, nurses'' views on patient safety, nursing activities in multicultural environments and progress in nursing practice. The main topic areas include: -Clinical nursing -Management in nursing -Evidence-based nursing -Multicultural nursing -Nursing ethics -Quality of life in illness 2. The social sciences in health section accepts contributions relating to any aspect of health from a broad perspective of the social sciences, including the medical impact on society. It also accepts contributions dealing with ethical issues in health care, risk management and the impact of political and economic conditions in the field of health. The aim of the articles is to develop understanding and to provide practical application of quantitative and qualitative research methods concerning the management, application or use of the research in health and social care. The main topic areas include: -Social determinants of health -Social work and health -Legal and economic issues concerning health -Ethical issues in social sciences and health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信