TIME AND GEOLOCATION UNCERTAINTIES AS COMPONENTS OF THE ACCURACY OF NEAS’ GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS

A. Pomazan, N. Maigurova, O. Kozhuhov
{"title":"TIME AND GEOLOCATION UNCERTAINTIES AS COMPONENTS OF THE ACCURACY OF NEAS’ GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS","authors":"A. Pomazan, N. Maigurova, O. Kozhuhov","doi":"10.18524/1810-4215.2022.35.268214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The one of main tasks for solving the as teroid-cometary hazard problem is cataloging all objects that might come extremely close to Earth and pose a poten tial threat of collision. The reliability of their orbits significantly depends on the quality and the statistical treatment of astrometric observations, which are obtained by different observers and different techniques. Statistical analysis of the IAU MPC observational array of the small Solar system bodies and the development of a scheme for assigning weights to individual observation sets are im portant for performing asteroid orbit determination and refinement. Errors in the positions of asteroids associated with errors in the reference catalogs, observation epoch, observed brightness and rate of motion are considered in sufficient detail in investigations of Chesley et al. (2010), Farnocchia (2015), Vereš et al. (2017). Timing and geolo cation uncertainties of the observer are less discussed in the literature. But in the case of observations of NEAs, espe cially at the moments of the close approaches to the Earth, timing errors and errors in the observatory's geolocation can significantly affect the accuracy of the obtained positions. Residual differences (O - C) in the equatorial coordinate system are usually used to search and identify functional errors dependencies. To detect errors caused by timing uncertainties, instead of residual differences (О - С) in equatorial coordinates, it is more convenient to use their along-track and cross-track representation. The cross-track differences are independent of timing errors and indicate only astrometric errors. On the other hand, timing errors are fully contained in the along-track component. Here we present the simulation results of such errors and analysis using an array of observations from three observatories for the period 2017 - 2022. The array con tains more than 18,000 positions of about 900 objects. Most of the objects belong to the group of NEAs, which include PHAs during close approaches to the Earth.","PeriodicalId":34039,"journal":{"name":"Odessa Astronomical Publications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odessa Astronomical Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/1810-4215.2022.35.268214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The one of main tasks for solving the as teroid-cometary hazard problem is cataloging all objects that might come extremely close to Earth and pose a poten tial threat of collision. The reliability of their orbits significantly depends on the quality and the statistical treatment of astrometric observations, which are obtained by different observers and different techniques. Statistical analysis of the IAU MPC observational array of the small Solar system bodies and the development of a scheme for assigning weights to individual observation sets are im portant for performing asteroid orbit determination and refinement. Errors in the positions of asteroids associated with errors in the reference catalogs, observation epoch, observed brightness and rate of motion are considered in sufficient detail in investigations of Chesley et al. (2010), Farnocchia (2015), Vereš et al. (2017). Timing and geolo cation uncertainties of the observer are less discussed in the literature. But in the case of observations of NEAs, espe cially at the moments of the close approaches to the Earth, timing errors and errors in the observatory's geolocation can significantly affect the accuracy of the obtained positions. Residual differences (O - C) in the equatorial coordinate system are usually used to search and identify functional errors dependencies. To detect errors caused by timing uncertainties, instead of residual differences (О - С) in equatorial coordinates, it is more convenient to use their along-track and cross-track representation. The cross-track differences are independent of timing errors and indicate only astrometric errors. On the other hand, timing errors are fully contained in the along-track component. Here we present the simulation results of such errors and analysis using an array of observations from three observatories for the period 2017 - 2022. The array con tains more than 18,000 positions of about 900 objects. Most of the objects belong to the group of NEAs, which include PHAs during close approaches to the Earth.
时间和地理位置的不确定性是影响卫星地面观测精度的因素
解决小行星-彗星危险问题的主要任务之一是对所有可能非常接近地球并构成潜在碰撞威胁的物体进行分类。它们轨道的可靠性在很大程度上取决于天文观测的质量和统计处理,这些观测是由不同的观测者和不同的技术获得的。对IAU MPC对太阳系小天体的观测阵列进行统计分析,并制定一种分配单个观测集权重的方案,对于进行小行星轨道确定和改进具有重要意义。在Chesley et al.(2010)、Farnocchia(2015)、vereis et al.(2017)的研究中,充分详细地考虑了与参考星表误差、观测年代、观测亮度和运动速率相关的小行星位置误差。在文献中很少讨论观测者的时间和地理不确定性。但在近地天体观测中,特别是在接近地球的时刻,时间误差和天文台地理定位的误差会显著影响所获得位置的准确性。赤道坐标系下的残差(O - C)通常用于搜索和识别函数误差相关性。为了检测由时间不确定性引起的误差,使用赤道坐标系的沿航迹和交叉航迹表示比使用赤道坐标系的剩余差(О - С)更方便。交叉航迹差与授时误差无关,仅表示天文测量误差。另一方面,定时误差完全包含在沿轨分量中。在这里,我们给出了这些误差的模拟结果,并利用三个观测站在2017 - 2022年期间的一系列观测结果进行了分析。该数组包含约900个对象的18,000多个位置。大多数天体属于近地天体,其中包括在接近地球时的pha。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信