Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, T. Kolettis
{"title":"Investigational Therapies and Patients’ Autonomy","authors":"Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou, T. Kolettis","doi":"10.7202/1073786ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1073786ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growing demand for novel therapies has raised new ethical dilemmas for society. Vigorous debates have been initiated, especially after the recent Right to Try Act in the US, which aims to facilitate access to new agents, even at an early stage of the investigation process. This article explores the concept of patient’s autonomy in accessing investigational treatments, and discusses the implications of autonomy for patients, researchers and regulatory authorities. We propose that, in cases of adequate understanding of the anticipated risks and benefits, society should accept patients’ autonomy in choosing to try new therapies, even in the absence of firm data. However, basic ethical principles should not be compromised, as the medical community and society as a whole retain the right to properly evaluate the accumulated experience from such cases. These thoughts may contribute to the ongoing discussions on ethical policies in clinical research.
研究性疗法和患者自主权
对新疗法日益增长的需求给社会带来了新的伦理困境。激烈的辩论已经开始,尤其是在美国最近通过了《审判权法案》(Right to Try Act)之后,该法案旨在促进接触新的特工,即使是在调查过程的早期阶段。本文探讨了患者在获得研究性治疗方面的自主概念,并讨论了自主对患者、研究人员和监管机构的影响。我们建议,在充分了解预期风险和收益的情况下,社会应该接受患者在选择尝试新疗法时的自主权,即使在缺乏可靠数据的情况下。然而,基本的伦理原则不应受到损害,因为医学界和整个社会都有权正确评价从这些案例中积累的经验。这些想法可能有助于正在进行的关于临床研究伦理政策的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Canadian Journal of Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信