Decoupled functional and phylogenetic diversity provide complementary information about community assembly mechanisms: A case study of Greek forests

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Anna Mastrogianni , Diogenis A. Kiziridis , Milan Chytrý , Athanasios S. Kallimanis , Ioannis Tsiripidis
{"title":"Decoupled functional and phylogenetic diversity provide complementary information about community assembly mechanisms: A case study of Greek forests","authors":"Anna Mastrogianni ,&nbsp;Diogenis A. Kiziridis ,&nbsp;Milan Chytrý ,&nbsp;Athanasios S. Kallimanis ,&nbsp;Ioannis Tsiripidis","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2023.103933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the mechanisms of community assembly is of great importance to biogeography and ecology. Simultaneous investigation of the functional and phylogenetic facets of diversity has been proposed as a useful approach that allows inferences about such mechanisms. This study applies such an approach to explore diversity and structure within and among the main plant community types of mountainous forests in northern and central Greece. Functional and phylogenetic diversity and structure were measured in 25 community types of broadleaved deciduous and mountainous coniferous forests. Functional richness and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity were used to assess diversity, while mean pairwise functional and phylogenetic distances were used to investigate structure. Relationships between both facets of diversity and structure, as well as community types, were tested using boosted regression trees separately for all vascular plant taxa and taxa occurring in the forest understorey. Phylogenetic diversity was positively correlated with functional diversity, but phylogenetic structure was not a good predictor of functional structure. The understorey dataset revealed non-random structure for more vegetation plots than the dataset with all taxa. Habitat effects, represented by community types, were found to be better predictors of functional structure than phylogenetic structure, highlighting the need to account for habitat variability in studies of community assembly. In our study system, the two diversity facets provide complementary information on the structure of community types since most of the vegetation plots studied were found statistically significantly structured for one diversity facet (functionally clustered or phylogenetically overdispersed) and random for the other. Our results indicate that functional and phylogenetic measures provide different insights into the mechanisms driving the assembly of the forest community types studied.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X23000450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of community assembly is of great importance to biogeography and ecology. Simultaneous investigation of the functional and phylogenetic facets of diversity has been proposed as a useful approach that allows inferences about such mechanisms. This study applies such an approach to explore diversity and structure within and among the main plant community types of mountainous forests in northern and central Greece. Functional and phylogenetic diversity and structure were measured in 25 community types of broadleaved deciduous and mountainous coniferous forests. Functional richness and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity were used to assess diversity, while mean pairwise functional and phylogenetic distances were used to investigate structure. Relationships between both facets of diversity and structure, as well as community types, were tested using boosted regression trees separately for all vascular plant taxa and taxa occurring in the forest understorey. Phylogenetic diversity was positively correlated with functional diversity, but phylogenetic structure was not a good predictor of functional structure. The understorey dataset revealed non-random structure for more vegetation plots than the dataset with all taxa. Habitat effects, represented by community types, were found to be better predictors of functional structure than phylogenetic structure, highlighting the need to account for habitat variability in studies of community assembly. In our study system, the two diversity facets provide complementary information on the structure of community types since most of the vegetation plots studied were found statistically significantly structured for one diversity facet (functionally clustered or phylogenetically overdispersed) and random for the other. Our results indicate that functional and phylogenetic measures provide different insights into the mechanisms driving the assembly of the forest community types studied.

解耦的功能和系统发育多样性提供了关于群落组装机制的补充信息:以希腊森林为例
了解群落聚集机制对生物地理学和生态学具有重要意义。同时研究多样性的功能和系统发育方面被认为是一种有用的方法,可以对这种机制进行推断。本研究应用这种方法来探索希腊北部和中部山区森林主要植物群落类型内部和之间的多样性和结构。对阔叶落叶林和山地针叶林25种群落类型的功能、系统发育多样性和结构进行了测定。利用功能丰富度和Faith’s系统发育多样性评价多样性,利用平均两两功能距离和系统发育距离评价结构。利用增强回归树分别对所有维管植物类群和林下植物类群的多样性和结构以及群落类型之间的关系进行了测试。系统发育多样性与功能多样性正相关,但系统发育结构不能很好地预测功能结构。与所有分类群的数据集相比,下层数据集显示出更多植被样地的非随机结构。研究发现,以群落类型为代表的生境效应比系统发育结构更能预测功能结构,这突出了在群落聚集研究中考虑生境变异性的必要性。在我们的研究系统中,这两个多样性方面提供了关于群落类型结构的互补信息,因为大多数研究的植被样地在统计上发现,一个多样性方面(功能聚集或系统发育过度分散)具有显著的结构,而另一个多样性方面则是随机的。我们的研究结果表明,功能和系统发育的测量为研究的森林群落类型聚集的驱动机制提供了不同的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信