Evaluation of modified STONE score in patients presenting to the emergency department with flank pain

IF 0.6 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
A. Uzun, M. Korkut, M. Kartal, C. Bedel
{"title":"Evaluation of modified STONE score in patients presenting to the emergency department with flank pain","authors":"A. Uzun, M. Korkut, M. Kartal, C. Bedel","doi":"10.4103/UROS.UROS_32_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Renal colic due to urinary system stone disease is one of the main complaints in emergency department (ED) admissions. The STONE score is the most used model. The “race” item in the nomogram is not useful for communities where the Black race is not dominant. Therefore, we aimed at investigating the diagnostic value of a new modified scoring system, in which we replaced the “race” item in the original nomogram by “obstruction = pelvicalyceal dilation.” Materials and Methods: The study included patients who were admitted to a tertiary university ED with flank pain and underwent ultrasonography (US) from June 2017 to November 2017. Patients' demographic data such as US findings and the STONE score parameters were recorded. “Obstruction (pelvicalyceal dilation)” replaced the “race” item of the original STONE score. The diagnostic value of the modified system was investigated by categorizing the scores as low risk (0–5 points), moderate risk (6–9 points), and high risk (10–13). Results: The study included 305 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 39.45 ± 13.83 years, and 170 patients (55.7%) were male. Pelvicalyceal dilation was detected on US at a statistically significantly higher percentage in patients with stones compared to stone-free patients (P < 0.001). The modified STONE score was statistically significantly higher in patients with stones compared to stone-free patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion: We suggest that the replacement of the race parameter of the original STONE score by the US finding of pelvicalyceal dilation will enhance the diagnostic value of scoring in societies mostly comprising a non-Black population.","PeriodicalId":23449,"journal":{"name":"Urological Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"221 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/UROS.UROS_32_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Renal colic due to urinary system stone disease is one of the main complaints in emergency department (ED) admissions. The STONE score is the most used model. The “race” item in the nomogram is not useful for communities where the Black race is not dominant. Therefore, we aimed at investigating the diagnostic value of a new modified scoring system, in which we replaced the “race” item in the original nomogram by “obstruction = pelvicalyceal dilation.” Materials and Methods: The study included patients who were admitted to a tertiary university ED with flank pain and underwent ultrasonography (US) from June 2017 to November 2017. Patients' demographic data such as US findings and the STONE score parameters were recorded. “Obstruction (pelvicalyceal dilation)” replaced the “race” item of the original STONE score. The diagnostic value of the modified system was investigated by categorizing the scores as low risk (0–5 points), moderate risk (6–9 points), and high risk (10–13). Results: The study included 305 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 39.45 ± 13.83 years, and 170 patients (55.7%) were male. Pelvicalyceal dilation was detected on US at a statistically significantly higher percentage in patients with stones compared to stone-free patients (P < 0.001). The modified STONE score was statistically significantly higher in patients with stones compared to stone-free patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion: We suggest that the replacement of the race parameter of the original STONE score by the US finding of pelvicalyceal dilation will enhance the diagnostic value of scoring in societies mostly comprising a non-Black population.
改良STONE评分在急诊科腰痛患者中的评估
目的:泌尿系统结石引起的肾绞痛是急诊科(ED)就诊的主要主诉之一。STONE评分是最常用的模型。图中的“种族”一项对于黑人不占主导地位的社区是没有用的。因此,我们旨在研究一种新的改进评分系统的诊断价值,我们用“阻塞=骨盆骨扩张”取代了原始nomogram中的“race”项目。材料和方法:该研究纳入了2017年6月至2017年11月期间因侧腹疼痛入住某高等大学急诊科并接受超声检查(US)的患者。记录患者的人口学数据,如美国检查结果和STONE评分参数。以“梗阻(盆腔扩张)”代替原STONE评分的“种族”项。通过将评分分为低危(0-5分)、中危(6-9分)和高危(10-13分)来研究修改后的系统的诊断价值。结果:本研究纳入符合纳入标准的305例患者。平均年龄39.45±13.83岁,男性170例(55.7%)。肾结石患者在超声检查中盆腔肾盂扩张的比例明显高于无结石患者(P < 0.001)。结石患者的改良STONE评分显著高于无结石患者(P < 0.001)。结论:我们建议用美国盆腔扩张的发现取代原始STONE评分的种族参数将提高评分在主要由非黑人人口组成的社会中的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urological Science
Urological Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信