Evaluating the patient-perceived impact of a neratinib special access program in an Australian community pharmacy

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jessie Zhang, Lynn Cheong BPharm, PhD
{"title":"Evaluating the patient-perceived impact of a neratinib special access program in an Australian community pharmacy","authors":"Jessie Zhang,&nbsp;Lynn Cheong BPharm, PhD","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In Australia, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, and improved survival rates have placed an increased burden on the healthcare system. To better utilise community pharmacists in anticancer therapy, a medicine management service for neratinib was initiated in an Australian community pharmacy for patients with breast cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the experience and satisfaction of Australian breast cancer patients who received a pharmacist medicine management service for their neratinib treatment through a community pharmacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Patients enrolled in the neratinib special access program were invited to complete an electronic survey between February–September 2019. A mixed-methods approach was utilised in data analysis. Ethics approval was granted by the University of Canberra Human Research Ethics Committee (Project No: 20181648).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-three individuals completed the survey. A majority of participants (94%) were either ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ with the time the pharmacist spent with them. As part of the service, 88% of participants viewed the first pharmacist session as ‘absolutely’ worthwhile and 79% believed that the pharmacist interaction increased their understanding of neratinib therapy. Many participants supported the continued provision and expansion of the service (88%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This pilot study provided valuable insights into participants' experiences of a pharmacist medicine management service for neratinib therapy. The unique preferences and health information needs of patients were highlighted. Further investigation is needed to explore how community pharmacists may be best utilised to improve breast cancer care and support patient needs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1871","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Australia, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, and improved survival rates have placed an increased burden on the healthcare system. To better utilise community pharmacists in anticancer therapy, a medicine management service for neratinib was initiated in an Australian community pharmacy for patients with breast cancer.

Aim

To explore the experience and satisfaction of Australian breast cancer patients who received a pharmacist medicine management service for their neratinib treatment through a community pharmacy.

Method

Patients enrolled in the neratinib special access program were invited to complete an electronic survey between February–September 2019. A mixed-methods approach was utilised in data analysis. Ethics approval was granted by the University of Canberra Human Research Ethics Committee (Project No: 20181648).

Results

Thirty-three individuals completed the survey. A majority of participants (94%) were either ‘very satisfied’ or ‘satisfied’ with the time the pharmacist spent with them. As part of the service, 88% of participants viewed the first pharmacist session as ‘absolutely’ worthwhile and 79% believed that the pharmacist interaction increased their understanding of neratinib therapy. Many participants supported the continued provision and expansion of the service (88%).

Conclusion

This pilot study provided valuable insights into participants' experiences of a pharmacist medicine management service for neratinib therapy. The unique preferences and health information needs of patients were highlighted. Further investigation is needed to explore how community pharmacists may be best utilised to improve breast cancer care and support patient needs.

评估患者对澳大利亚社区药房纳拉替尼特殊准入项目的感知影响
在澳大利亚,乳腺癌是女性中最常见的癌症,生存率的提高给医疗保健系统带来了更大的负担。为了更好地利用社区药剂师进行抗癌治疗,澳大利亚一家社区药房开始为乳腺癌患者提供奈拉替尼的药物管理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信