Psychosocial interventions for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Phoutdavone Phimphasone-Brady Ph.D. , Brooke Palmer Ph.D. , Alyssa Vela Ph.D. , Rachel L. Johnson M.S. , Ben Harnke M.L.I.S. , Lilian Hoffecker Ph.D. , Helen L. Coons Ph.D. , C. Neill Epperson M.D.
{"title":"Psychosocial interventions for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Phoutdavone Phimphasone-Brady Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Brooke Palmer Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Alyssa Vela Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Rachel L. Johnson M.S. ,&nbsp;Ben Harnke M.L.I.S. ,&nbsp;Lilian Hoffecker Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Helen L. Coons Ph.D. ,&nbsp;C. Neill Epperson M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To synthesize the effects of psychosocial interventions to improve depression, anxiety, quality of life<span> (QOL), and other psychological outcomes in adult women living with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).</span></p></div><div><h3>Evidence Review</h3><p>On the basis of the guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews<span> and Meta-Analyses, we conducted a systematic review in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE ALL; Embase; Cochrane Central Library; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; American Psychological Association PsycInfo; and Elton B. Stephens CO (company) Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. A study was included if it was a randomized controlled trial that examined the effect of psychosocial interventions to improve psychological outcomes (primary or secondary) in adult women (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with PCOS. Study screening, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality was conducted by 3 independent reviewers through a systematic process. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment for randomized controlled trials was used to assess the risk-of-bias and methodological quality. The results were combined and summarized in a narrative synthesis, and factors that may explain differences in the direction or effect sizes were considered and discussed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Of the 127 studies that met the initial inclusion criteria, we included 7 studies for full-text review, with an average sample size of 83 participants in the initial randomization. Across the 3 studies that reported race and ethnicity, an average of 57% of participants identified as White. There was significant heterogeneity across studies in terms of PCOS criteria followed, variation in outcome measures, variation in reporting of outcomes, and small sample sizes in each outcome, limiting our ability to estimate the magnitude of effects or standardized mean differences. Psychosocial interventions were cognitive behavioral therapy, </span>acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy combined with lifestyle modifications, or multicomponent behavioral modification program. Within the intervention groups, significant durations of effects from baseline to postintervention were observed for depression, anxiety, QOL, fatigue and sleep-related impairments, self-esteem, body image, perceived stress, and patient-reported outcomes for psychological distress and positive and negative affect. These findings demonstrate proof of concept that psychosocial interventions improve PCOS-related mental health issues. Significant results, however, between the intervention and control groups were inconsistent. Significant postintervention or 8-week outcomes were found in some, but not all, studies for depression, QOL, fatigue or sleep issues, self-esteem, body image, perceived stress, mindfulness, and negative affect. Further, only 2 studies found significant long-term or maintenance effects for body image and perceived stress. No studies found significant postintervention effects for anxiety or long-term effects for depression, anxiety, and QOL. Heterogeneity and poor methodological quality of studies likely explain inconsistency of significant postintervention and long-term results, compromising generalizability of results.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This review concludes that significant improvements in PCOS research for mental health assessment and treatments remain urgently needed, which has implications for the translation of evidence into clinical practice. Future research and recommendations are provided to improve the methodological quality of research and comprehensive care for this common yet underrecognized condition impacting women’s health and well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73011,"journal":{"name":"F&S reviews","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 42-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F&S reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666571921000268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

To synthesize the effects of psychosocial interventions to improve depression, anxiety, quality of life (QOL), and other psychological outcomes in adult women living with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Evidence Review

On the basis of the guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we conducted a systematic review in the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE ALL; Embase; Cochrane Central Library; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; American Psychological Association PsycInfo; and Elton B. Stephens CO (company) Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. A study was included if it was a randomized controlled trial that examined the effect of psychosocial interventions to improve psychological outcomes (primary or secondary) in adult women (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with PCOS. Study screening, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality was conducted by 3 independent reviewers through a systematic process. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment for randomized controlled trials was used to assess the risk-of-bias and methodological quality. The results were combined and summarized in a narrative synthesis, and factors that may explain differences in the direction or effect sizes were considered and discussed.

Results

Of the 127 studies that met the initial inclusion criteria, we included 7 studies for full-text review, with an average sample size of 83 participants in the initial randomization. Across the 3 studies that reported race and ethnicity, an average of 57% of participants identified as White. There was significant heterogeneity across studies in terms of PCOS criteria followed, variation in outcome measures, variation in reporting of outcomes, and small sample sizes in each outcome, limiting our ability to estimate the magnitude of effects or standardized mean differences. Psychosocial interventions were cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy combined with lifestyle modifications, or multicomponent behavioral modification program. Within the intervention groups, significant durations of effects from baseline to postintervention were observed for depression, anxiety, QOL, fatigue and sleep-related impairments, self-esteem, body image, perceived stress, and patient-reported outcomes for psychological distress and positive and negative affect. These findings demonstrate proof of concept that psychosocial interventions improve PCOS-related mental health issues. Significant results, however, between the intervention and control groups were inconsistent. Significant postintervention or 8-week outcomes were found in some, but not all, studies for depression, QOL, fatigue or sleep issues, self-esteem, body image, perceived stress, mindfulness, and negative affect. Further, only 2 studies found significant long-term or maintenance effects for body image and perceived stress. No studies found significant postintervention effects for anxiety or long-term effects for depression, anxiety, and QOL. Heterogeneity and poor methodological quality of studies likely explain inconsistency of significant postintervention and long-term results, compromising generalizability of results.

Conclusion

This review concludes that significant improvements in PCOS research for mental health assessment and treatments remain urgently needed, which has implications for the translation of evidence into clinical practice. Future research and recommendations are provided to improve the methodological quality of research and comprehensive care for this common yet underrecognized condition impacting women’s health and well-being.

多囊卵巢综合征妇女的社会心理干预:随机对照试验的系统回顾
目的综合心理社会干预对改善成年女性多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)抑郁、焦虑、生活质量(QOL)等心理结局的影响。在系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目指南的基础上,我们对以下数据库进行了系统评价:Ovid MEDLINE ALL;Embase;科克伦中央图书馆;Cochrane系统评价数据库;美国心理学会;和Elton B. Stephens CO(公司)护理和相关健康文献累积索引。如果是一项随机对照试验,检查社会心理干预对改善诊断为多囊卵巢综合征的成年女性(年龄≥18岁)的心理结局(主要或次要)的影响,则纳入一项研究。研究筛选、数据提取和方法学质量评估由3名独立审稿人通过系统流程进行。随机对照试验的Cochrane偏倚风险评估用于评估偏倚风险和方法学质量。结果被合并和总结在一个叙事综合,并考虑和讨论可能解释的方向或效应大小的差异的因素。在符合初始纳入标准的127项研究中,我们纳入了7项研究进行全文综述,初始随机化的平均样本量为83名参与者。在3项关于种族和民族的研究中,平均有57%的参与者认为自己是白人。在PCOS标准、结果测量的差异、结果报告的差异以及每个结果的小样本量方面,研究之间存在显著的异质性,限制了我们估计影响程度或标准化平均差异的能力。心理社会干预包括认知行为疗法、接受和承诺疗法、以正念为基础的减压、认知行为疗法结合生活方式改变或多组分行为改变计划。在干预组中,从基线到干预后,观察到抑郁、焦虑、生活质量、疲劳和睡眠相关障碍、自尊、身体形象、感知压力和患者报告的心理困扰结果以及积极和消极影响的显著持续时间。这些发现证明了社会心理干预可以改善多囊卵巢综合征相关的心理健康问题。然而,干预组和对照组之间的显著结果并不一致。在一些(但不是全部)关于抑郁、生活质量、疲劳或睡眠问题、自尊、身体形象、感知压力、正念和负面影响的研究中,发现了显著的干预后或8周结果。此外,只有2项研究发现身体形象和感知压力有显著的长期或维持作用。没有研究发现干预后对焦虑的显著影响或对抑郁、焦虑和生活质量的长期影响。研究的异质性和较差的方法学质量可能解释了显著的干预后和长期结果的不一致,从而损害了结果的普遍性。结论PCOS在心理健康评估和治疗方面的研究亟待改进,这对将证据转化为临床实践具有重要意义。提出了今后的研究和建议,以提高对影响妇女健康和福祉的这一常见但未得到充分认识的疾病的研究和综合护理的方法质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F&S reviews
F&S reviews Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Urology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信