‘Framing figures’ and the campaign for sex purchase criminalisation in Ireland: A Lakoffian analysis

Q2 Social Sciences
Eilís Ward
{"title":"‘Framing figures’ and the campaign for sex purchase criminalisation in Ireland: A Lakoffian analysis","authors":"Eilís Ward","doi":"10.1177/0791603520951754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If the concept of social justice posits equality and fairness between subjects in the social order, then the presence of those subjects within that order must first and foremost be acknowledged. In Ireland’s recent reform of prostitution law contained in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017, the presence of the sex worker as a rights-bearing subject or citizen, with access to justice in that capacity, was denied. In this article I focus on the use of data by the neo-abolitionist ‘Turn off the Red Light’ campaign to ‘flatten out’ the complexity of sex workers lives and present the figure of the ‘vulnerable prostituted woman’ and the ‘trafficking victim’: tragic, abject, a necessarily violated person and in need of ‘protection’ from the state. I argue that this data, entering public and political discourse as uncontestable truth, constituted what I call, ‘framing figures’, framing an inevitable outcome and precluding certain subjects from the status of equality and fairness. The data allowed campaigners for the Sex Purchase Ban (SPB), and, in turn the state, to eclipse a social justice approach to sex work, such as proposed by the Sex Workers Alliance of Ireland and other actors.","PeriodicalId":52497,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Sociology","volume":"28 1","pages":"314 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0791603520951754","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0791603520951754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

If the concept of social justice posits equality and fairness between subjects in the social order, then the presence of those subjects within that order must first and foremost be acknowledged. In Ireland’s recent reform of prostitution law contained in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2017, the presence of the sex worker as a rights-bearing subject or citizen, with access to justice in that capacity, was denied. In this article I focus on the use of data by the neo-abolitionist ‘Turn off the Red Light’ campaign to ‘flatten out’ the complexity of sex workers lives and present the figure of the ‘vulnerable prostituted woman’ and the ‘trafficking victim’: tragic, abject, a necessarily violated person and in need of ‘protection’ from the state. I argue that this data, entering public and political discourse as uncontestable truth, constituted what I call, ‘framing figures’, framing an inevitable outcome and precluding certain subjects from the status of equality and fairness. The data allowed campaigners for the Sex Purchase Ban (SPB), and, in turn the state, to eclipse a social justice approach to sex work, such as proposed by the Sex Workers Alliance of Ireland and other actors.
“陷害数字”与爱尔兰性购买犯罪化运动:拉科菲分析
如果社会正义的概念假定社会秩序中主体之间的平等和公平,那么必须首先承认这些主体在该秩序中的存在。在爱尔兰最近的《2017年刑法(性犯罪)法》中所载的卖淫法改革中,性工作者作为权利主体或公民的存在,以及以这种身份诉诸司法的机会,被拒绝。在这篇文章中,我重点关注新废奴主义者“关掉红灯”运动对数据的使用,以“消除”性工作者生活的复杂性,并呈现“弱势妓女”和“贩运受害者”的形象:悲惨、卑鄙、必然受到侵犯的人,需要国家的“保护”。我认为,这些数据作为无可争辩的真相进入公共和政治话语,构成了我所说的“数字框架”,框架了不可避免的结果,并将某些主体排除在平等和公平的地位之外。这些数据使性购买禁令(SPB)的活动人士,以及反过来的州,能够掩盖爱尔兰性工作者联盟和其他行为者提出的性工作的社会正义方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Sociology
Irish Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书