Right to Information, Judicial Activism and the Rule of Law: The case of Indonesia’s mining litigation

Myrna Asnawati Safitri
{"title":"Right to Information, Judicial Activism and the Rule of Law: The case of Indonesia’s mining litigation","authors":"Myrna Asnawati Safitri","doi":"10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to information is fundamental in environmental protection. Lack of access to information regarding environmental planning and licensing has often lead to public interest environmental litigation. The right to information is also an element in the formation of the rule of law in both its formal and substantive aspects. Mining must be cautionary conducted due to its high potential for environmental damage and pollution. This paper discusses the extent to which is the right to environmental information protected in Indonesia through several cases of mining litigation. Using statutory and court cases methods, it discusses laws on the rights to information in general and in the field of environmental protection, how Indonesian courts have interpreted the government obligations to fulfill citizens' access to mining information, and the extent to which that legal interpretation contributes to the rule of law elements. This paper then concludes that the right to mining information is still difficult to attain. Public bodies tend to prioritize formal-procedural aspects in providing information and setting up a public consultation. However, the cases studied indicate that judicial activism has provided corrections to such a procedural approach. More substantive rule of law principles used by the courts to interpret mining zones and environmental permits procedures.","PeriodicalId":31451,"journal":{"name":"Brawijaya Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brawijaya Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right to information is fundamental in environmental protection. Lack of access to information regarding environmental planning and licensing has often lead to public interest environmental litigation. The right to information is also an element in the formation of the rule of law in both its formal and substantive aspects. Mining must be cautionary conducted due to its high potential for environmental damage and pollution. This paper discusses the extent to which is the right to environmental information protected in Indonesia through several cases of mining litigation. Using statutory and court cases methods, it discusses laws on the rights to information in general and in the field of environmental protection, how Indonesian courts have interpreted the government obligations to fulfill citizens' access to mining information, and the extent to which that legal interpretation contributes to the rule of law elements. This paper then concludes that the right to mining information is still difficult to attain. Public bodies tend to prioritize formal-procedural aspects in providing information and setting up a public consultation. However, the cases studied indicate that judicial activism has provided corrections to such a procedural approach. More substantive rule of law principles used by the courts to interpret mining zones and environmental permits procedures.
知情权、司法能动性与法治——以印度尼西亚矿业诉讼为例
知情权是环境保护的基本权利。缺乏获取环境规划和许可信息的途径常常导致公益环境诉讼。知情权在形式和实质方面都是法治形成的一个要素。采矿对环境造成破坏和污染的可能性很大,因此必须谨慎进行。本文通过几个矿业诉讼案例,探讨了环境信息权在印尼的保护程度。本文采用法定和法庭案例的方法,讨论了一般信息权和环境保护领域的法律,印度尼西亚法院如何解释政府履行公民获取采矿信息的义务,以及这种法律解释在多大程度上有助于法治要素。最后得出结论:信息采掘权仍难以实现。公共机构在提供信息和建立公众协商方面往往优先考虑正式程序方面的问题。然而,所研究的案例表明,司法能动主义为这种程序方法提供了纠正。法院用来解释矿区和环境许可程序的更实质性的法治原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书