Big Data, Congress, and the Rhetoric of Technology: Or, How to Industrialize Cyberspace

Poroi Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.13008/2151-2957.1284
C. Adamczyk
{"title":"Big Data, Congress, and the Rhetoric of Technology: Or, How to Industrialize Cyberspace","authors":"C. Adamczyk","doi":"10.13008/2151-2957.1284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": As new and developing technologies impact public and private life, rhetoricians would be remiss to overlook the deliberative rhetorics that justify their development, implementation, use-value, and impact. Using the 2013 joint congressional heari ng “Next Generation Computing and Big Data Analytics” as an example, I argue that justificatory rhetorics about technology intersect with rhetoric from technology, obscuring information vital to critical deliberation. I demonstrate that the expert witnesses at this hearing draw upon rhetoric traditionally associated with American industrialization. Doing so allows them to articulate Big Data as a resource situated upon a metaphorical, American landscape and thus encourages the public to treat it as a natural resource that must be exploited for the betterment of the nation. Ultimately, I argue the use of this rhetoric dissuades critical analysis of the worth of Big Data and investigation of its technical aspects. This raises troubling questions about the ability of rhetoric about technology to both veil and guides what the public accepts as ethical rhetoric from technology. technical aspects of Big Data technology. The witnesses draw upon the American middle-landscape myth by using a mishmash of natural, utopian, ameliorative, and transformative narratives to deflect critical","PeriodicalId":93222,"journal":{"name":"Poroi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poroi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: As new and developing technologies impact public and private life, rhetoricians would be remiss to overlook the deliberative rhetorics that justify their development, implementation, use-value, and impact. Using the 2013 joint congressional heari ng “Next Generation Computing and Big Data Analytics” as an example, I argue that justificatory rhetorics about technology intersect with rhetoric from technology, obscuring information vital to critical deliberation. I demonstrate that the expert witnesses at this hearing draw upon rhetoric traditionally associated with American industrialization. Doing so allows them to articulate Big Data as a resource situated upon a metaphorical, American landscape and thus encourages the public to treat it as a natural resource that must be exploited for the betterment of the nation. Ultimately, I argue the use of this rhetoric dissuades critical analysis of the worth of Big Data and investigation of its technical aspects. This raises troubling questions about the ability of rhetoric about technology to both veil and guides what the public accepts as ethical rhetoric from technology. technical aspects of Big Data technology. The witnesses draw upon the American middle-landscape myth by using a mishmash of natural, utopian, ameliorative, and transformative narratives to deflect critical
大数据、国会和技术修辞:或者,如何使网络空间工业化
:由于新技术和发展中的技术影响着公共和私人生活,修辞学家忽视了证明其发展、实施、使用价值和影响的审慎修辞。以2013年国会联合听证会“下一代计算和大数据分析”为例,我认为,关于技术的正当修辞与来自技术的修辞相交叉,掩盖了对批判性审议至关重要的信息。我证明,在这次听证会上,专家证人引用了传统上与美国工业化有关的言论。这样做可以让他们将大数据阐明为一种位于隐喻性的美国景观上的资源,从而鼓励公众将其视为一种自然资源,必须为改善国家而加以利用。最终,我认为这种修辞的使用阻碍了对大数据价值的批判性分析和对其技术方面的调查。这引发了一个令人不安的问题,即关于技术的言论是否有能力掩盖和引导公众接受的技术伦理言论。大数据技术的技术方面。目击者利用美国中产阶级的神话,使用自然、乌托邦、改良和变革的叙事来转移批评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信