Spatial prediction of soil electrical conductivity using soil axillary data, soft data derived from general linear model and error measurement.

Desert Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.22059/JDESERT.2020.78169
N. Hamzehpour, M. Rahmati, B. Roohzad
{"title":"Spatial prediction of soil electrical conductivity using soil axillary data, soft data derived from general linear model and error measurement.","authors":"N. Hamzehpour, M. Rahmati, B. Roohzad","doi":"10.22059/JDESERT.2020.78169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indirect measurement of soil electrical conductivity (EC) has become a major data source in spatial/temporal monitoring of soil salinity. However, in many cases, the weak correlation between direct and indirect measurement of EC has reduced the accuracy and performance of the predicted maps. The objective of this research was to estimate soil EC based on a general linear model via using several soil properties. Through calibration equations, the error involved in such model-based data was calculated and employed in mapping soil EC using kriging with measurement errors (KME) method. The results were then compared with those of ordinary kriging (OK) and co-kriging (CK). Soil samples were taken from the depth of 0-20 cm in 78 points with spatial intervals of 500 m from an area of 40 km2, and they were analyzed for their electrical conductivity (EC) and certain other soil properties. Measured soil EC data (hard data) and auxiliary soil data were further used to develop the semi-variance and cross-semi-variance functions; moreover, soil salinity prediction was done on a grid of 100 m with OK and CK methods. Afterwards, the most optimal EC estimation model was developed using auxiliary soil data and GLM. As predicted values always involve uncertainty, the error involved with the predicted values was calculated and then the calibration equations were adjusted. Lastly, soil salinity was predicted using KME method. Results showed that the OK method had the lowest MSE and RMSE values, 0.65 and 0.8 dS m-1, respectively. Furthermore, among the auxiliary data, pH and silt content resulted in some of the best cross-semi-variance functions, among which, silt had a better performance regarding the spatial prediction of soil EC. The GLM model developed with the calculated error and KME resulted in predictions close to those of OK method (with MSE and RMSE of 0.74 and 0.86 dS m-1, respectively). KME method provided the possibility of merging error resulting from the use of soft data, derived from prediction equations; therefore, it successfully improved the spatial prediction of soil electrical conductivity","PeriodicalId":11118,"journal":{"name":"Desert","volume":"25 1","pages":"87-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desert","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/JDESERT.2020.78169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Indirect measurement of soil electrical conductivity (EC) has become a major data source in spatial/temporal monitoring of soil salinity. However, in many cases, the weak correlation between direct and indirect measurement of EC has reduced the accuracy and performance of the predicted maps. The objective of this research was to estimate soil EC based on a general linear model via using several soil properties. Through calibration equations, the error involved in such model-based data was calculated and employed in mapping soil EC using kriging with measurement errors (KME) method. The results were then compared with those of ordinary kriging (OK) and co-kriging (CK). Soil samples were taken from the depth of 0-20 cm in 78 points with spatial intervals of 500 m from an area of 40 km2, and they were analyzed for their electrical conductivity (EC) and certain other soil properties. Measured soil EC data (hard data) and auxiliary soil data were further used to develop the semi-variance and cross-semi-variance functions; moreover, soil salinity prediction was done on a grid of 100 m with OK and CK methods. Afterwards, the most optimal EC estimation model was developed using auxiliary soil data and GLM. As predicted values always involve uncertainty, the error involved with the predicted values was calculated and then the calibration equations were adjusted. Lastly, soil salinity was predicted using KME method. Results showed that the OK method had the lowest MSE and RMSE values, 0.65 and 0.8 dS m-1, respectively. Furthermore, among the auxiliary data, pH and silt content resulted in some of the best cross-semi-variance functions, among which, silt had a better performance regarding the spatial prediction of soil EC. The GLM model developed with the calculated error and KME resulted in predictions close to those of OK method (with MSE and RMSE of 0.74 and 0.86 dS m-1, respectively). KME method provided the possibility of merging error resulting from the use of soft data, derived from prediction equations; therefore, it successfully improved the spatial prediction of soil electrical conductivity
利用土壤腋窝数据、一般线性模型导出的软数据和误差测量对土壤电导率进行空间预测。
土壤电导率(EC)的间接测量已成为土壤盐度时空监测的主要数据来源。然而,在许多情况下,EC的直接和间接测量之间的弱相关性降低了预测地图的准确性和性能。本研究的目的是通过使用几种土壤特性,在一般线性模型的基础上估计土壤EC。通过校准方程,计算了这些基于模型的数据中涉及的误差,并将其用于使用带有测量误差的克里格法(KME)绘制土壤EC。然后将结果与普通克里格法(OK)和联合克里格法的结果进行比较。土壤样本取自0-20厘米深度的78个点,空间间隔为500米,面积为40平方公里,并对其电导率(EC)和某些其他土壤特性进行了分析。进一步利用实测土壤EC数据(硬数据)和辅助土壤数据建立半方差和交叉半方差函数;此外,采用OK和CK方法在100m网格上进行了土壤盐度预测。然后,利用辅助土壤数据和GLM建立了最优EC估计模型。由于预测值总是涉及不确定性,因此计算与预测值相关的误差,然后调整校准方程。最后,利用KME方法对土壤盐度进行了预测。结果表明,OK方法具有最低的MSE和RMSE值,分别为0.65和0.8dSm-1。此外,在辅助数据中,pH和含泥量产生了一些最好的交叉半方差函数,其中,含泥量在土壤EC的空间预测方面具有更好的性能。根据计算误差和KME建立的GLM模型的预测结果与OK方法的预测结果接近(MSE和RMSE分别为0.74和0.86dSM-1)。KME方法提供了合并由于使用从预测方程导出的软数据而产生的误差的可能性;因此,它成功地改进了土壤电导率的空间预测
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信