Giovanni Gentile's standing in the United States (1922–1938)

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
S. Zappoli
{"title":"Giovanni Gentile's standing in the United States (1922–1938)","authors":"S. Zappoli","doi":"10.1177/00145858231161636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his preface to The Social Philosophy of Giovanni Gentile, HS Harris wrote that “[Gentile's] association with Fascism, of which he was an ardent supporter from 1923 until his own death during the last throes of the Fascist Social Republic, prejudiced the issue. Critical evaluation of his political and social thought has been almost impossible for the Italians themselves because of the general climate of political opinion both before and after his death; and almost everyone outside Italy followed the lead given by Croce and dismissed Gentile's practical philosophy as unworthy of serious critical examination.” This statement undoubtedly points at an effective historiographical question. The present article aims to shed light on this issue, taking into consideration specifically the writings published about Gentile in the United States in the 1920s and 1930s. Some research has already been undertaken in this field, but it seems ripe for being further developed. Interest in the work of Gentile came especially from the intellectual circles of Columbia University and his work has usually been interpreted by historians as resulting from pro-fascist leanings. Yet, a closer examination of sources and consequently a more analytical reconstruction of the context suggests that the reception of the educational thought of Gentile and the knowledge of his political activity during the Fascist regime took place in the United States quite independently from political sympathies.","PeriodicalId":12355,"journal":{"name":"Forum Italicum","volume":"57 1","pages":"735 - 746"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Italicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00145858231161636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his preface to The Social Philosophy of Giovanni Gentile, HS Harris wrote that “[Gentile's] association with Fascism, of which he was an ardent supporter from 1923 until his own death during the last throes of the Fascist Social Republic, prejudiced the issue. Critical evaluation of his political and social thought has been almost impossible for the Italians themselves because of the general climate of political opinion both before and after his death; and almost everyone outside Italy followed the lead given by Croce and dismissed Gentile's practical philosophy as unworthy of serious critical examination.” This statement undoubtedly points at an effective historiographical question. The present article aims to shed light on this issue, taking into consideration specifically the writings published about Gentile in the United States in the 1920s and 1930s. Some research has already been undertaken in this field, but it seems ripe for being further developed. Interest in the work of Gentile came especially from the intellectual circles of Columbia University and his work has usually been interpreted by historians as resulting from pro-fascist leanings. Yet, a closer examination of sources and consequently a more analytical reconstruction of the context suggests that the reception of the educational thought of Gentile and the knowledge of his political activity during the Fascist regime took place in the United States quite independently from political sympathies.
Giovanni Gentile在美国的地位(1922–1938)
哈里斯在《乔瓦尼·詹蒂勒的社会哲学》的序言中写道:“(詹蒂勒)从1923年起一直是法西斯主义的狂热支持者,直到他在法西斯社会共和国最后的阵痛中去世,他与法西斯主义的联系对这个问题产生了偏见。”对他的政治和社会思想进行批判性评价对意大利人自己来说几乎是不可能的,因为他死前和死后的政治舆论的普遍气候;几乎所有意大利以外的人都追随克罗齐的领导,认为外邦人的实践哲学不值得认真的批判性研究。”这句话无疑指出了一个有效的史学问题。本文以20世纪二三十年代在美国发表的有关外邦人的著作为研究对象,旨在阐明这一问题。在这个领域已经进行了一些研究,但似乎还有待进一步发展。对Gentile作品的兴趣尤其来自哥伦比亚大学的知识界,他的作品通常被历史学家解释为亲法西斯倾向的结果。然而,对资料来源的更仔细的检查以及对背景的更分析性的重建表明,在法西斯政权期间,接受外邦人的教育思想和了解他的政治活动是在美国独立于政治同情的情况下发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum Italicum
Forum Italicum Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信