Russian Peasants and Soldiers during World War I: Home and Front Interacting

J. Bushnell
{"title":"Russian Peasants and Soldiers during World War I: Home and Front Interacting","authors":"J. Bushnell","doi":"10.1080/10611983.2017.1372983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue presents a set of articles that examine, from different points of view and drawing on very different sources, the manner and extent to whic World War I alienated Russia’s soldiers and peasants from the tsarist regime. Historians generally deal with soldiers and peasants separately, which on the face of it is odd: since 84–88 percent of the Russian soldiers who took part in the war were peasants (I take that figure from the article by Aleksandr Astashov published in this issue), one might postulate that soldier and peasant responses to the war must in some way have been linked. Viewed from another perspective, the ways in which soldiers and peasants experienced and suffered from the war were so radically different that perhaps wartime life in combat units and villages should be treated separately. The articles published here, however, suggest to me that soldiers’ and peasants’ attitudes toward the war evolved together: what peasants thought affected soldiers, and vice versa. The first selection, “The General Mobilization of the Russian Army in 1914 and the Peasantry (Based on Documents from Saratov Province)” (2002), by Anton Viktorovich Posadskii (Volga Institute of Management), is a summary of the principal findings Posadskii presented in a monograph of the same title (also published in 2002). The monograph was immediately recognized as methodologically exemplary and a departure from the lingering Soviet-era interpretation of the riots by mobilized reserves that broke out across Russia. One of Posadskii’s achievements was to demonstrate that provincial archives (holding local police and court records, for instance) reveal far more mob action by reserves being mustered into the army than historians working in the central military and police archives had Russian Studies in History, vol. 56, no. 2, 2017, pp. 65–72. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1983 (print)/ISSN 1558-0881 (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2017.1372983","PeriodicalId":89267,"journal":{"name":"Russian studies in history","volume":"56 1","pages":"65 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611983.2017.1372983","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian studies in history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2017.1372983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This issue presents a set of articles that examine, from different points of view and drawing on very different sources, the manner and extent to whic World War I alienated Russia’s soldiers and peasants from the tsarist regime. Historians generally deal with soldiers and peasants separately, which on the face of it is odd: since 84–88 percent of the Russian soldiers who took part in the war were peasants (I take that figure from the article by Aleksandr Astashov published in this issue), one might postulate that soldier and peasant responses to the war must in some way have been linked. Viewed from another perspective, the ways in which soldiers and peasants experienced and suffered from the war were so radically different that perhaps wartime life in combat units and villages should be treated separately. The articles published here, however, suggest to me that soldiers’ and peasants’ attitudes toward the war evolved together: what peasants thought affected soldiers, and vice versa. The first selection, “The General Mobilization of the Russian Army in 1914 and the Peasantry (Based on Documents from Saratov Province)” (2002), by Anton Viktorovich Posadskii (Volga Institute of Management), is a summary of the principal findings Posadskii presented in a monograph of the same title (also published in 2002). The monograph was immediately recognized as methodologically exemplary and a departure from the lingering Soviet-era interpretation of the riots by mobilized reserves that broke out across Russia. One of Posadskii’s achievements was to demonstrate that provincial archives (holding local police and court records, for instance) reveal far more mob action by reserves being mustered into the army than historians working in the central military and police archives had Russian Studies in History, vol. 56, no. 2, 2017, pp. 65–72. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1983 (print)/ISSN 1558-0881 (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2017.1372983
第一次世界大战期间的俄国农民和士兵:后方与前线的互动
本期将呈现一系列文章,从不同的角度和非常不同的来源,考察一战使俄罗斯士兵和农民与沙皇政权疏远的方式和程度。历史学家通常将士兵和农民分开处理,这从表面上看是奇怪的:因为参加战争的俄罗斯士兵中有84 - 88%是农民(我从亚历山大·阿斯塔索夫在本期发表的文章中获得了这个数字),人们可能会假设士兵和农民对战争的反应一定在某种程度上是有联系的。从另一个角度来看,士兵和农民在战争中经历和遭受的方式是完全不同的,也许战斗部队和村庄的战时生活应该分开对待。然而,在这里发表的文章向我表明,士兵和农民对战争的态度是共同演变的:农民的想法影响着士兵,反之亦然。第一个选集,“1914年俄罗斯军队和农民的总动员(基于萨拉托夫省的文件)”(2002),由安东·维克托罗维奇·波萨斯基(伏尔加管理学院)撰写,是对波萨斯基在同名专著(也于2002年出版)中提出的主要发现的总结。这本专著立即被认为是方法论上的典范,与苏联时代对俄罗斯各地爆发的动员后备军骚乱的解释有所不同。波萨德斯基的成就之一是证明了省级档案(例如保存着当地警察和法庭记录的档案)所揭示的预备役人员被召集到军队中的暴民行为,远远超过了在中央军事和警察档案工作的历史学家所发表的《俄罗斯历史研究》(第56卷第1期)。2, 2017, pp. 65-72。©Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1983(印刷)/ISSN 1558-0881(在线)DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2017.1372983
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信