Facilitating the ideas-informed society: a systematic review

Christopher S. Brown, Ruth Luzmore, Jana Groß Ophoff
{"title":"Facilitating the ideas-informed society: a systematic review","authors":"Christopher S. Brown, Ruth Luzmore, Jana Groß Ophoff","doi":"10.35241/emeraldopenres.14729.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The concept of the ideas-informed society represents a desired situation in which: 1) citizens see value in staying up to date, and 2) citizens regularly keep themselves up to date by actively engaging with new ideas, developments and claims to truth, doing so both openly and critically. As a result, individuals become ever more knowledgeable, are better able to make good decisions, as well as find themselves in better position to re-align their values in response to new progressive norms and beliefs. Given these potential benefits, of primary interest are those who do not value staying up to date, nor attempt to do so. Methods: With this systematic review we have sought to identify ways to consider how such ‘ideas refusers’ might be switched-on to engaging with new ideas. We have done so by exploring: 1) the factors which act as barriers to and enablers of the actualisation of the ideas-informed society; 2) interventions/programmes and community-led activities developed to actualise the ideas-informed society; and 3) other non-empirically tested/verified suggestions for how the ideas-informed society might be actualised. Our findings derive from 25 research outputs (from a total of 631 originally identified) as well as examine case studies of ‘bottom-up’ analogous activities. Results: Our review highlights the presence of seemingly impactful approaches to enabling citizens to engage with new ideas, including science cafés and museum exhibitions. Other more bottom-up approaches include community-based events and festivals; social networks (and discussion within these networks) are also key to whether and how individuals engage with ideas, and the breadth of ideas they engage with. Conclusions: We conclude by suggesting development and rigorous testing is now needed of interventions that seek to: 1) pique citizens’ curiosity; 2) establish connections to social networks and; 3) arm citizens with essential ideas-related dispositions.","PeriodicalId":91015,"journal":{"name":"Emerald open research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerald open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.14729.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The concept of the ideas-informed society represents a desired situation in which: 1) citizens see value in staying up to date, and 2) citizens regularly keep themselves up to date by actively engaging with new ideas, developments and claims to truth, doing so both openly and critically. As a result, individuals become ever more knowledgeable, are better able to make good decisions, as well as find themselves in better position to re-align their values in response to new progressive norms and beliefs. Given these potential benefits, of primary interest are those who do not value staying up to date, nor attempt to do so. Methods: With this systematic review we have sought to identify ways to consider how such ‘ideas refusers’ might be switched-on to engaging with new ideas. We have done so by exploring: 1) the factors which act as barriers to and enablers of the actualisation of the ideas-informed society; 2) interventions/programmes and community-led activities developed to actualise the ideas-informed society; and 3) other non-empirically tested/verified suggestions for how the ideas-informed society might be actualised. Our findings derive from 25 research outputs (from a total of 631 originally identified) as well as examine case studies of ‘bottom-up’ analogous activities. Results: Our review highlights the presence of seemingly impactful approaches to enabling citizens to engage with new ideas, including science cafés and museum exhibitions. Other more bottom-up approaches include community-based events and festivals; social networks (and discussion within these networks) are also key to whether and how individuals engage with ideas, and the breadth of ideas they engage with. Conclusions: We conclude by suggesting development and rigorous testing is now needed of interventions that seek to: 1) pique citizens’ curiosity; 2) establish connections to social networks and; 3) arm citizens with essential ideas-related dispositions.
促进思想知情社会:系统综述
背景:思想信息社会的概念代表了一种理想的情况,在这种情况下:1)公民看到保持与时俱进的价值;2)公民通过积极参与新思想、新发展和对真理的主张,公开和批判地定期让自己保持与时俱进。因此,个人变得越来越有见识,能够更好地做出正确的决定,并发现自己处于更好的位置,可以重新调整自己的价值观,以响应新的进步规范和信仰。考虑到这些潜在的好处,最感兴趣的是那些不重视保持最新,也不试图这样做的人。方法:通过这个系统的回顾,我们试图找出一些方法来考虑这些“拒绝想法的人”是如何开始接受新想法的。为此,我们探索了:1)阻碍和推动实现思想信息社会的因素;2)制定干预措施/计划和社区主导的活动,以实现思想知情的社会;3)其他非经验检验/验证的关于如何实现思想知情社会的建议。我们的发现来自25项研究成果(来自最初确定的631项研究成果),以及对“自下而上”类似活动的案例研究。结果:我们的回顾强调了一些看似有效的方法,使公民能够接触到新思想,包括科学研讨会和博物馆展览。其他自下而上的方法包括以社区为基础的活动和节日;社交网络(以及在这些网络中的讨论)也是决定个人是否以及如何参与思想,以及他们参与思想的广度的关键。结论:我们的结论是,现在需要开发和严格测试干预措施,以寻求:1)激起公民的好奇心;2)建立与社交网络的联系;3)用基本的思想相关的倾向武装公民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信