Tail Risk Hedging: Contrasting Put and Trend Strategies

A. Ilmanen, Ashwin K Thapar, Harsha Tummala, Daniel Villalon
{"title":"Tail Risk Hedging: Contrasting Put and Trend Strategies","authors":"A. Ilmanen, Ashwin K Thapar, Harsha Tummala, Daniel Villalon","doi":"10.52354/JSI.1.1.VI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We summarize key research findings on risk-mitigating strategies and offer\nan overview of the strengths and weaknesses of regular index put buying\n(“Put”) and multi-asset trend following (“Trend”) as tail hedges. The two\nbiggest questions we address are: (1) What is the long-term average\nreturn or cost, and (2) How reliable and efficient is the hedge in equity\nmarket tail events? We present empirical answers and discuss the\neconomic rationale for each question. The common view that Put costs\nmore but is a more effective tail hedge contains a kernel of truth but does\nnot capture the full story. We will give a more nuanced picture, including\npracticality for investors, but in the end show the cost advantage favors\nTrend over Put.","PeriodicalId":30123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52354/JSI.1.1.VI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We summarize key research findings on risk-mitigating strategies and offer an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of regular index put buying (“Put”) and multi-asset trend following (“Trend”) as tail hedges. The two biggest questions we address are: (1) What is the long-term average return or cost, and (2) How reliable and efficient is the hedge in equity market tail events? We present empirical answers and discuss the economic rationale for each question. The common view that Put costs more but is a more effective tail hedge contains a kernel of truth but does not capture the full story. We will give a more nuanced picture, including practicality for investors, but in the end show the cost advantage favors Trend over Put.
尾部风险对冲:看跌和趋势策略的对比
我们总结了风险缓释策略的关键研究结果,并概述了常规指数看跌期权购买(“看跌期权”)和多资产趋势跟踪(“趋势”)作为尾部对冲的优势和劣势。我们要解决的两个最大问题是:(1)长期平均回报或成本是多少,以及(2)在股票市场尾部事件中套期保值的可靠性和效率有多高?我们给出了实证答案,并讨论了每个问题的经济学原理。普遍认为Put成本更高,但却是一种更有效的尾部对冲,这包含了一个真相的核心,但并没有抓住整个故事。我们将给出一个更微妙的画面,包括对投资者的实用性,但最终显示出成本优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信