Charactor of Modality and Resident Level in Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Neurosurgical Education

Anbis El Hakim
{"title":"Charactor of Modality and Resident Level in Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Neurosurgical Education","authors":"Anbis El Hakim","doi":"10.31579/2637-8892/021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evolving pressure on surgical education necessitates safe and efficient learning of techniques. We evaluated the effect of training year using anatomic, percutaneous fluoroscopy guided and computer navigated techniques on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement to attempt to determine if different modalities may be better suited for different levels of training. Methods: All instrumented thoracic and lumbar cases performed at Detroit Medical Center by the Neurosurgery Service between August 2012 and June 2013 were included.Cases had hardware verified by post-operative CT. Hardware placement was graded according to Mirza SK et al., grade 0 (within pedicle), grade 1 (< 2 mm breach), grade 2 (> 2 mm breach) , and grade 3 (extrapedicular). Pedicle screws were reviewed independently by a resident and attending surgeon. Rates of pedicle breach, EBL, length of case, pedicle size and pedicle starting point were all reviewed. Pedicles were analyzed on PACS system in axial views, using sagittal views to identify the correct level. Results: A total of 306 pedicle screws were evaluated in 36 patients. The overall rate of accurate pedicle screw placement among residents defined as Grade 0 or 1 placement was 86.8%.Fluoroscopically placed screws had significantly less breaches than anatomic screws 11% vs 20% (p = 0.03). Fluoroscopic cases had significantly less medial breeches (20%) than anatomic (50%) (p < 0.05) and computer assisted cases (73%) (p < 0.05). EBL values for fluoroscopic, anatomic and Body Tom cases were 425 cc, 720 cc, and 816 cc respectively. Resident level was found to be inversely proportional to breech rate (R squared 0.45). We did not see any clear difference in breach rate for resident level in different modalities. Conclusion: Supervised neurosurgical residents can place pedicle screws within published rates of acceptable breach. Interestingly our study revealed an inverse relationship between resident experience and pedicle screw accuracy. Fluoroscopic placement of pedicle screws compared to computer assisted and anatomic techniques results in lower medial breach rate and may be better suited for junior level residents.","PeriodicalId":92947,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and mental health care : open access","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and mental health care : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evolving pressure on surgical education necessitates safe and efficient learning of techniques. We evaluated the effect of training year using anatomic, percutaneous fluoroscopy guided and computer navigated techniques on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement to attempt to determine if different modalities may be better suited for different levels of training. Methods: All instrumented thoracic and lumbar cases performed at Detroit Medical Center by the Neurosurgery Service between August 2012 and June 2013 were included.Cases had hardware verified by post-operative CT. Hardware placement was graded according to Mirza SK et al., grade 0 (within pedicle), grade 1 (< 2 mm breach), grade 2 (> 2 mm breach) , and grade 3 (extrapedicular). Pedicle screws were reviewed independently by a resident and attending surgeon. Rates of pedicle breach, EBL, length of case, pedicle size and pedicle starting point were all reviewed. Pedicles were analyzed on PACS system in axial views, using sagittal views to identify the correct level. Results: A total of 306 pedicle screws were evaluated in 36 patients. The overall rate of accurate pedicle screw placement among residents defined as Grade 0 or 1 placement was 86.8%.Fluoroscopically placed screws had significantly less breaches than anatomic screws 11% vs 20% (p = 0.03). Fluoroscopic cases had significantly less medial breeches (20%) than anatomic (50%) (p < 0.05) and computer assisted cases (73%) (p < 0.05). EBL values for fluoroscopic, anatomic and Body Tom cases were 425 cc, 720 cc, and 816 cc respectively. Resident level was found to be inversely proportional to breech rate (R squared 0.45). We did not see any clear difference in breach rate for resident level in different modalities. Conclusion: Supervised neurosurgical residents can place pedicle screws within published rates of acceptable breach. Interestingly our study revealed an inverse relationship between resident experience and pedicle screw accuracy. Fluoroscopic placement of pedicle screws compared to computer assisted and anatomic techniques results in lower medial breach rate and may be better suited for junior level residents.
椎弓根螺钉准确性与神经外科教育的方式和住院水平特征
目的:不断变化的外科教育压力需要安全有效的技术学习。我们使用解剖、经皮透视和计算机导航技术评估了训练年份对椎弓根螺钉放置准确性的影响,试图确定不同的训练方式是否更适合不同的训练水平。方法:选取2012年8月至2013年6月在底特律医疗中心神经外科服务处行胸腰椎固定手术的所有病例。病例经术后CT硬件验证。根据Mirza SK等人对硬体置入进行分级,0级(椎弓根内)、1级(< 2mm断裂)、2级(> 2mm断裂)和3级(椎弓根外)。椎弓根螺钉由住院医师和主治医师独立复查。我们回顾了椎弓根断裂率、EBL、病例长度、椎弓根大小和椎弓根起始点。在PACS系统的轴向视图上分析椎弓根,使用矢状面视图来确定正确的水平。结果:36例患者共使用306枚椎弓根螺钉。在被定义为0级或1级的住院患者中,准确放置椎弓根螺钉的总体率为86.8%。透视下放置的螺钉比解剖螺钉的断裂明显少11%比20% (p = 0.03)。透视病例(20%)明显少于解剖病例(50%)(p < 0.05)和计算机辅助病例(73%)(p < 0.05)。透视、解剖和体Tom病例的EBL值分别为425 cc、720 cc和816 cc。发现居民水平与臀位率成反比(R平方0.45)。我们没有看到在不同模式的居民水平的违约率有任何明显的差异。结论:有监督的神经外科住院医师可以在公布的可接受的骨折率内放置椎弓根螺钉。有趣的是,我们的研究揭示了住院经验与椎弓根螺钉精确度之间的反比关系。与计算机辅助和解剖技术相比,透视置入椎弓根螺钉的内侧骨折率较低,可能更适合初级水平的住院医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信