The Role of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder

IF 0.4 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Mainak Pal, N. Mandal, Anirban Ray, Pradip K. Saha
{"title":"The Role of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder","authors":"Mainak Pal, N. Mandal, Anirban Ray, Pradip K. Saha","doi":"10.1177/09731342221141028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with impairments in language acquisition, social functioning, and restricted and repetitive behaviors. There is no definitive management for the ASD spectrum. The management options available are not beyond criticism. Hence, the search for new options is actively in progress. Noninvasive brain stimulation interventions such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) appears to be a promising tool for the treatment of ASD. However, the available literature on TMS use in ASD is preliminary. Methods: This was a hospital-based longitudinal study conducted over 50 patients with ASD of 6 to 16 years of age. The Indian Scale for Assessment of Autism (ISAA) was used for the assessment of the extent of disability in these children. They were given 10 sessions of rTMS over a period of 10 days over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) and reassessed for any improvement in ISAA score after 1 day and 3 months of completion of all the sessions of rTMS. Results: There was no statistically significant change in the total ISAA score or any of the 6 domains of ISAA after 1 day and 3 months of giving 10 sessions of TMS. There were no significant adverse effects after giving rTMS. In a few patients, mild headache, neck pain, or discomfort at the stimulation site was noted. Conclusion: This study has shown that low-frequency rTMS does not have any significant improvement on the various symptoms of ASD. However, there are no major adverse effects after giving rTMS. Also, it points toward the need for further studies.","PeriodicalId":42760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09731342221141028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with impairments in language acquisition, social functioning, and restricted and repetitive behaviors. There is no definitive management for the ASD spectrum. The management options available are not beyond criticism. Hence, the search for new options is actively in progress. Noninvasive brain stimulation interventions such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) appears to be a promising tool for the treatment of ASD. However, the available literature on TMS use in ASD is preliminary. Methods: This was a hospital-based longitudinal study conducted over 50 patients with ASD of 6 to 16 years of age. The Indian Scale for Assessment of Autism (ISAA) was used for the assessment of the extent of disability in these children. They were given 10 sessions of rTMS over a period of 10 days over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) and reassessed for any improvement in ISAA score after 1 day and 3 months of completion of all the sessions of rTMS. Results: There was no statistically significant change in the total ISAA score or any of the 6 domains of ISAA after 1 day and 3 months of giving 10 sessions of TMS. There were no significant adverse effects after giving rTMS. In a few patients, mild headache, neck pain, or discomfort at the stimulation site was noted. Conclusion: This study has shown that low-frequency rTMS does not have any significant improvement on the various symptoms of ASD. However, there are no major adverse effects after giving rTMS. Also, it points toward the need for further studies.
重复性经颅磁刺激在自闭症谱系障碍治疗中的作用
引言:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)是一种神经发育障碍,在语言习得、社会功能、限制性和重复性行为方面存在障碍。ASD谱系没有明确的管理方法。现有的管理选择并非无可挑剔。因此,正在积极寻找新的选择。非侵入性脑刺激干预措施,如重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),似乎是治疗ASD的一种很有前途的工具。然而,关于经颅磁刺激在ASD中的应用的现有文献是初步的。方法:这是一项基于医院的纵向研究,对50名6-16岁的ASD患者进行了研究。印度自闭症评估量表(ISAA)用于评估这些儿童的残疾程度。在10天的时间里,他们在左背外侧前额叶皮层(l-DLPFC)接受了10次rTMS治疗,并在所有rTMS疗程完成1天和3个月后重新评估ISAA评分的任何改善。结果:在接受10次TMS治疗的1天和3个月后,ISAA总分或ISAA的6个领域中的任何一个都没有统计学上的显著变化。rTMS给药后无明显不良反应。少数患者出现轻度头痛、颈部疼痛或刺激部位不适。结论:本研究表明,低频rTMS对ASD的各种症状没有任何显著改善。然而,给予rTMS后没有严重的不良反应。此外,它还指出了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (JIACAM) is a peer reviewed online journal. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org) will be followed. JIACAM accepts original articles, review articles, case reports, conference announcements, summary of trials, letters to the editor and conference reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信