When Poetry Is Not Enough

Halina Filipowicz
{"title":"When Poetry Is Not Enough","authors":"Halina Filipowicz","doi":"10.5406/23300841.68.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Controversy has come to be a predictable feature of Holocaust studies. It is hardly surprising, then, that a process of constructing a transnational canon of Holocaust drama, slowly unfolding in critical commentary since the premieres of Rolf Hochhuth's Der Stellvertreter [The deputy] and Peter Weiss's Die Ermittlung [The investigation] in the 1960s, has been fraught with accusations that this questionable project is as much about forgetting as about remembering. Some critics point out, for example, that it gives scant attention to plays written during World War II and in the first years of peace. Though such oversights may be innocent, they signal the hermeneutical difficulty of recognizing works that for various, often non-artistic reasons have been consigned to oblivion with barely a second glance. One consequence of the oversights is to render the history of Holocaust memory and representation partial, not to say misleading. In this article, I want to recover Czesław Miłosz's only play, Prolog [Prologue, 1942], from obscurity and to argue that this text, written in the bloodiest year of the Holocaust, circles around an unstated center, the Shoah, wrestling with questions that continue to resonate some eighty years later.","PeriodicalId":83231,"journal":{"name":"The Polish review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Polish review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/23300841.68.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controversy has come to be a predictable feature of Holocaust studies. It is hardly surprising, then, that a process of constructing a transnational canon of Holocaust drama, slowly unfolding in critical commentary since the premieres of Rolf Hochhuth's Der Stellvertreter [The deputy] and Peter Weiss's Die Ermittlung [The investigation] in the 1960s, has been fraught with accusations that this questionable project is as much about forgetting as about remembering. Some critics point out, for example, that it gives scant attention to plays written during World War II and in the first years of peace. Though such oversights may be innocent, they signal the hermeneutical difficulty of recognizing works that for various, often non-artistic reasons have been consigned to oblivion with barely a second glance. One consequence of the oversights is to render the history of Holocaust memory and representation partial, not to say misleading. In this article, I want to recover Czesław Miłosz's only play, Prolog [Prologue, 1942], from obscurity and to argue that this text, written in the bloodiest year of the Holocaust, circles around an unstated center, the Shoah, wrestling with questions that continue to resonate some eighty years later.
当诗歌还不够时
争议已经成为大屠杀研究的一个可预见的特征。因此,自20世纪60年代罗尔夫·霍赫胡特(Rolf Hochhuth)的《副官》(Der Stellvertreter)和彼得·韦斯(Peter Weiss)的《调查》(Die Ermittlung)首映以来,构建大屠杀题材跨国经典的过程在批评性评论中慢慢展开,充满了指责,认为这个有问题的项目既是关于记忆的,也是关于遗忘的,这一点也不奇怪。例如,一些评论家指出,它对第二次世界大战期间和和平初期创作的戏剧缺乏关注。虽然这样的疏忽可能是无辜的,但它们表明了辨认作品在解释学上的困难,因为各种各样的,通常是非艺术的原因,几乎不需要再看一眼就被遗忘了。这种疏忽的后果之一是使大屠杀记忆和再现的历史变得片面,甚至是误导。在这篇文章中,我想从默默无闻中恢复Czesław Miłosz唯一的剧本《序言》(Prolog, 1942),并论证这篇写于大屠杀最血腥的一年的文本,围绕着一个未明确的中心,即“浩劫”(Shoah),与大约80年后仍在引起共鸣的问题作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信