The different impact of personal social capital and intra-organizational SC: The Enron case study

Q2 Social Sciences
Batia Ben-Hador, Eyal Eckhaus
{"title":"The different impact of personal social capital and intra-organizational SC: The Enron case study","authors":"Batia Ben-Hador, Eyal Eckhaus","doi":"10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThis study relates to two levels of organization social capital (SC): personal SC and intra-organizational SC. Personal SC is the utility derived from the person’s relationship, and his positioning in networks, inside and out of the organization. Intra-organizational SC is the benefit derived from interactions within, and between groups in the organization, and is based on trust, reciprocity, common goals, sharing information and knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to examine the difference between the SC levels by their connections to employee energy and success, before and after crisis. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nIn order to test the hypotheses, the authors used the Enron e-mails corpus, the texts were analyzed using SQL. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe findings suggest that the impact of personal SC and intra-organizational SC, on employee energy and success is different. Personal SC was found to have a higher impact on those two variables, than intra-organizational SC. After crisis, this gap became larger. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe importance of the findings is in the distinction between the SC levels, and their different impact on the employees. However, the situation of Enron employees at that time implies that the more important level of SC is the intra-organizational SC.","PeriodicalId":35239,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","volume":"21 1","pages":"28-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-004","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Purpose This study relates to two levels of organization social capital (SC): personal SC and intra-organizational SC. Personal SC is the utility derived from the person’s relationship, and his positioning in networks, inside and out of the organization. Intra-organizational SC is the benefit derived from interactions within, and between groups in the organization, and is based on trust, reciprocity, common goals, sharing information and knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to examine the difference between the SC levels by their connections to employee energy and success, before and after crisis. Design/methodology/approach In order to test the hypotheses, the authors used the Enron e-mails corpus, the texts were analyzed using SQL. Findings The findings suggest that the impact of personal SC and intra-organizational SC, on employee energy and success is different. Personal SC was found to have a higher impact on those two variables, than intra-organizational SC. After crisis, this gap became larger. Originality/value The importance of the findings is in the distinction between the SC levels, and their different impact on the employees. However, the situation of Enron employees at that time implies that the more important level of SC is the intra-organizational SC.
个人社会资本与组织内决策的不同影响:以安然公司为例
目的本研究涉及组织社会资本的两个层次:个人社会资本和组织内社会资本。个人社会资本是个人关系及其在组织内外网络中的定位所产生的效用。组织内供应链是从组织内和组织内团队之间的互动中获得的利益,基于信任、互惠、共同目标、共享信息和知识。本文的目的是通过危机前后SC水平与员工能量和成功的关系来检验它们之间的差异。设计/方法/方法为了检验这些假设,作者使用了安然电子邮件语料库,并使用SQL对文本进行了分析。研究结果表明,个人SC和组织内SC对员工能量和成功的影响是不同的。与组织内SC相比,个人SC对这两个变量的影响更大。危机后,这一差距变得更大。原创性/价值研究结果的重要性在于SC级别之间的区别,以及它们对员工的不同影响。然而,安然员工当时的情况表明,SC更重要的层面是组织内SC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior brings together researchers and practitioners, both within and outside the United States, who are in the areas of organization theory, management, development, and behavior. This journal covers all private, public and not-for-profit organizations’ theories and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信