From the Editor

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS
ARETHUSA Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/are.2022.0004
R. Woodard, A. Hooper, Nick Ollivère, R. Matera, A. Peterson
{"title":"From the Editor","authors":"R. Woodard, A. Hooper, Nick Ollivère, R. Matera, A. Peterson","doi":"10.1353/are.2022.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper concerns the episode of Aristophanes' hiccups in Plato's Symposium. The sequence is typically understood to be not merely a comic aside but rather a means by which Aristophanes offers commentary on the claims of the other speakers in the dialogue. But where scholars have focused on the significance of this passage concerning Eryximachus's account of Eros, I argue that the hiccups episode also serves as a critique of Pausanias's speech. Particularly, I suggest that the hiccups episode serves as a critique of the sophistic elements of Pausanias's account of Eros.","PeriodicalId":44750,"journal":{"name":"ARETHUSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARETHUSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2022.0004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This paper concerns the episode of Aristophanes' hiccups in Plato's Symposium. The sequence is typically understood to be not merely a comic aside but rather a means by which Aristophanes offers commentary on the claims of the other speakers in the dialogue. But where scholars have focused on the significance of this passage concerning Eryximachus's account of Eros, I argue that the hiccups episode also serves as a critique of Pausanias's speech. Particularly, I suggest that the hiccups episode serves as a critique of the sophistic elements of Pausanias's account of Eros.
来自编辑器
摘要:本文关注柏拉图《会饮篇》中阿里斯托芬打嗝的情节。这个顺序通常被理解为不仅仅是一个喜剧的旁白,而是阿里斯托芬对对话中其他说话人的主张进行评论的一种方式。但学者们关注的是这段关于厄律克西马库对厄洛斯的描述的意义,我认为打嗝的情节也可以作为对包萨尼亚演讲的批评。特别地,我认为打嗝这一段是对包萨尼亚对爱神的描述中诡辩元素的批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARETHUSA
ARETHUSA CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Arethusa is known for publishing original literary and cultural studies of the ancient world and of the field of classics that combine contemporary theoretical perspectives with more traditional approaches to literary and material evidence. Interdisciplinary in nature, this distinguished journal often features special thematic issues.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信