Extraction and Environmental Injustices: (De)colonial Practices in Imbolo Mbue’s How Beautiful We Were

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Goutam Karmakar, R. Chetty
{"title":"Extraction and Environmental Injustices: (De)colonial Practices in Imbolo Mbue’s How Beautiful We Were","authors":"Goutam Karmakar, R. Chetty","doi":"10.25120/etropic.22.2.2023.3970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental degradation, climate crises, and ecological catastrophes effect the countries of the tropics distinctly from those of the Global North, reflecting the ramifications of colonial capitalist epistemes and practices that sanction extraction, commodification, and control of tropical lands and peoples. Imbolo Mbue’s How Beautiful We Were (2021), set in the fictional African village of Kosawa, bears witness to the history and presence of ecological disaster in the African tropics through issues related to extractivism, environmental injustices, and structural racism that are ongoing under the mask of capitalist progress and development. Mbue, a Cameroonian-American novelist, recounts Kosawa’s decades-long struggle against the American oil company Pexton. This article focuses on the critical aspect that Mbue’s discourse reveals—that there is a need to map environmental injustices with other forms of structural injustices and the prevalence of neocolonialism and its manifestations through racial, economic, and epistemic practices. The article further explicates how the ordinary people of Kosawa become subjected to “slow violence” and “testimonial injustice” and foregrounds the necessity of “epistemic disobedience” demonstrated in the novel through the madman’s intervention and Thula’s sustained resistance to the exploitative agendas.\n ","PeriodicalId":37374,"journal":{"name":"eTropic","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eTropic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.22.2.2023.3970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental degradation, climate crises, and ecological catastrophes effect the countries of the tropics distinctly from those of the Global North, reflecting the ramifications of colonial capitalist epistemes and practices that sanction extraction, commodification, and control of tropical lands and peoples. Imbolo Mbue’s How Beautiful We Were (2021), set in the fictional African village of Kosawa, bears witness to the history and presence of ecological disaster in the African tropics through issues related to extractivism, environmental injustices, and structural racism that are ongoing under the mask of capitalist progress and development. Mbue, a Cameroonian-American novelist, recounts Kosawa’s decades-long struggle against the American oil company Pexton. This article focuses on the critical aspect that Mbue’s discourse reveals—that there is a need to map environmental injustices with other forms of structural injustices and the prevalence of neocolonialism and its manifestations through racial, economic, and epistemic practices. The article further explicates how the ordinary people of Kosawa become subjected to “slow violence” and “testimonial injustice” and foregrounds the necessity of “epistemic disobedience” demonstrated in the novel through the madman’s intervention and Thula’s sustained resistance to the exploitative agendas.  
采掘与环境不公:Imbolo Mbue的《我们是多么美丽》中的殖民实践
环境退化、气候危机和生态灾难对热带国家的影响与全球北方国家截然不同,反映了殖民资本主义的认识和实践的后果,这些认识和实践批准了对热带土地和人民的开采、商品化和控制。Imbolo Mbue的《We Were How Beautiful》(2021)以虚构的非洲村庄Kosawa为背景,通过与资本主义进步和发展的面具下正在进行的采掘、环境不公正和结构性种族主义有关的问题,见证了非洲热带地区生态灾难的历史和存在。喀麦隆裔美国小说家Mbue讲述了小泽与美国石油公司Pexton长达数十年的斗争。本文重点关注Mbue的论述所揭示的关键方面,即有必要将环境不公正与其他形式的结构性不公正、新殖民主义的盛行及其通过种族、经济和认知实践的表现联系起来。文章进一步阐述了小泽的普通百姓是如何遭受“缓慢的暴力”和“证言的不公正”的,并通过疯子的干预和苏拉对剥削议程的持续抵抗,强调了小说中“认识上的不服从”的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
eTropic
eTropic Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信