The role of teachers' intelligence conceptions, teaching beliefs and self-efficacy on classroom management practices

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
M. Catalano, G. Vecchio, P. Perucchini
{"title":"The role of teachers' intelligence conceptions, teaching beliefs and self-efficacy on classroom management practices","authors":"M. Catalano, G. Vecchio, P. Perucchini","doi":"10.3280/rip2022oa13394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Substantial evidence has been collected over decades of research on the relationships between optimal classroom management and student learning. In addition, there is a growing body of research on teachers' beliefs, in which their relationships with teachers' practices is viewed as significant. This study investigated classroom management practices in a sample of 1,056 Italian teachers working from pre-primary to secondary school, to analyse the differences by school level and teaching experience, and their associations with three categories of teachers' beliefs: self-efficacy, teaching beliefs and intelligence conceptions. Three dimensions of classroom management were considered: educational relationships, active strategies and emotion regulation. The results show that teachers differ in their practices in relation to school level and years of experience, with associations between different categories of beliefs highlighted. Classroom management was positively linked to self-efficacy, constructive teaching beliefs and constructive intelligence conceptions, and negatively linked to traditional teaching beliefs and innate intelligence conceptions. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses that considered the three dimensions of classroom management as dependent variables highlighted the concurrent contribution of: innate and constructive teaching beliefs for educational relationships; school level, intelligence conceptions, constructive teaching beliefs and self-efficacy on classroom management for active strategies; and school level for emotion regulation. These results confirm the strong relationships between classroom management and teachers' beliefs and conceptions. Thus, it is important for teachers to develop reflective processes of their own practices.","PeriodicalId":41732,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche di Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche di Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa13394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Substantial evidence has been collected over decades of research on the relationships between optimal classroom management and student learning. In addition, there is a growing body of research on teachers' beliefs, in which their relationships with teachers' practices is viewed as significant. This study investigated classroom management practices in a sample of 1,056 Italian teachers working from pre-primary to secondary school, to analyse the differences by school level and teaching experience, and their associations with three categories of teachers' beliefs: self-efficacy, teaching beliefs and intelligence conceptions. Three dimensions of classroom management were considered: educational relationships, active strategies and emotion regulation. The results show that teachers differ in their practices in relation to school level and years of experience, with associations between different categories of beliefs highlighted. Classroom management was positively linked to self-efficacy, constructive teaching beliefs and constructive intelligence conceptions, and negatively linked to traditional teaching beliefs and innate intelligence conceptions. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses that considered the three dimensions of classroom management as dependent variables highlighted the concurrent contribution of: innate and constructive teaching beliefs for educational relationships; school level, intelligence conceptions, constructive teaching beliefs and self-efficacy on classroom management for active strategies; and school level for emotion regulation. These results confirm the strong relationships between classroom management and teachers' beliefs and conceptions. Thus, it is important for teachers to develop reflective processes of their own practices.
教师的智力观念、教学信念和自我效能感在课堂管理实践中的作用
几十年来,关于最佳课堂管理与学生学习之间关系的研究收集了大量证据。此外,关于教师信仰的研究越来越多,其中教师信仰与教师实践的关系被认为是重要的。本研究调查了1056名从学前到中学的意大利教师的课堂管理实践,分析了学校水平和教学经验的差异,以及它们与教师信念的三类联系:自我效能感、教学信念和智力观念。课堂管理的三个维度是:教育关系、主动策略和情绪调节。结果显示,教师的实践与学校水平和经验年数有关,不同类别的信仰之间的联系尤为突出。课堂管理与自我效能感、建设性教学信念、建设性智力观念呈正相关,与传统教学信念、先天智力观念呈负相关。将课堂管理的三个维度作为因变量的层次多元回归分析强调了以下因素对教育关系的共同贡献:先天的和建设性的教学信念;学校水平、智力观念、建设性教学信念和自我效能感对课堂积极策略管理的影响;情绪调节的学校水平。这些结果证实了课堂管理与教师的信念和观念之间的密切关系。因此,教师对自己的实践进行反思是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Ricerche di psicologia(Psychology Research) is a scientific journal - addressed primarily to the community of Italian psychologists, both academic and professional - which tackles all psychological issues. Each issue contains a series of papers on the most salient and up-to-date themes of contemporary psychological research. Ricerche di psicologia focuses particular attention on: general, cognitive and experimental psychology; history of psychology; physiological psychology, neuropsychology and psychobiology; comparative and animal psychology; psychometrics and psychological research methodology, developmental and educational psychology; social psychology; work and organizational psychology; dynamic psychology; clinical psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信