Parental Reproductive Liberty for Choosing the Sex of Their Offspring: an Analysis of the Positions in Muslim Law and Christianity

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Sayed Sikandar Shah Haneef, Mohd Abbas Abdul Razak
{"title":"Parental Reproductive Liberty for Choosing the Sex of Their Offspring: an Analysis of the Positions in Muslim Law and Christianity","authors":"Sayed Sikandar Shah Haneef, Mohd Abbas Abdul Razak","doi":"10.18690/10.18690/mls.12.2.61-78.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological developments in the domain of fertility treatment in spite of thier utilitarian uses come with a plethora of ethico-religious challenges for people of faith particularly if they contradict some of their core religious values and beliefs about human procreation. The most disruptive among such challenges is declaring parental choice of a specific gender to their future offspring as part of their reproductive liberty (right). As to how major semitic religions, such as Christionaity and Islam respond to it, the answer is polemical. Christianity genrally objects to it mainly because it turns procreation into a manufacturing business instead of leaving the sex of a baby to God. The Islamic position, on the other hand, is less rigid as the majority of Sunni Muslim legists, without much reflections on its ethical dilemmas, approve it not only for medical reason but also family balancing while dissenting views among them consider it a direct affront on what God has declard to be His domain of perfection of human procreation. This paper, therefore, argues that defining parents` decision on sexing a “right” or “liberty” is difficult to maintain unless a far-fetched perspective of scriptural texts is adopted.","PeriodicalId":40345,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Law & Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Law & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/10.18690/mls.12.2.61-78.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Technological developments in the domain of fertility treatment in spite of thier utilitarian uses come with a plethora of ethico-religious challenges for people of faith particularly if they contradict some of their core religious values and beliefs about human procreation. The most disruptive among such challenges is declaring parental choice of a specific gender to their future offspring as part of their reproductive liberty (right). As to how major semitic religions, such as Christionaity and Islam respond to it, the answer is polemical. Christianity genrally objects to it mainly because it turns procreation into a manufacturing business instead of leaving the sex of a baby to God. The Islamic position, on the other hand, is less rigid as the majority of Sunni Muslim legists, without much reflections on its ethical dilemmas, approve it not only for medical reason but also family balancing while dissenting views among them consider it a direct affront on what God has declard to be His domain of perfection of human procreation. This paper, therefore, argues that defining parents` decision on sexing a “right” or “liberty” is difficult to maintain unless a far-fetched perspective of scriptural texts is adopted.
父母选择子女性别的生育自由:穆斯林法律和基督教立场分析
生育治疗领域的技术发展尽管具有实用性,但也给有信仰的人带来了大量的伦理和宗教挑战,特别是当它们与他们关于人类生殖的一些核心宗教价值观和信仰相抵触时。在这些挑战中,最具破坏性的是向未来的后代宣布父母选择特定性别是他们生育自由(权利)的一部分。至于主要的犹太宗教,如基督教和伊斯兰教是如何回应的,答案是有争议的。基督教普遍反对这种做法,主要是因为它把生育变成了一种制造业务,而不是把婴儿的性别留给上帝。另一方面,伊斯兰教的立场没有那么严格,因为大多数逊尼派穆斯林法学家没有对其伦理困境进行太多思考,不仅出于医学原因,而且出于家庭平衡的考虑,而持不同意见的人认为这是对真主宣称的完美人类生殖领域的直接侮辱。因此,本文认为,除非采用一种牵强附会的圣经文本观点,否则很难将父母对性别的决定定义为“权利”或“自由”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信