NOVATION AND ADVANCE CONSENT

IF 1.5 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

Cambridge Law Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.1017/S0008197322000472

K. Lau

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Professor Goode once observed that “Novation need not be left to ad hoc agreement; it is open to the parties to provide for it in advance and in particular to establish a contractual mechanism by which novation takes place automatically on the occurrence of a designated act or event”. This deceptively straightforward proposition is examined in the present article. It explores the legal footing for, and the risks in adopting a pristine version of, the proposition, and considers possible safeguards that may be incorporated within the process of scrutiny, if in any case there arises concern over the effectiveness of a novation that is undertaken pursuant to consent given in advance.

查看原文本刊更多论文

更替和事先同意

摘要古德教授曾指出，“更替不必由临时协议决定；当事人可以提前作出规定，特别是建立一种合同机制，在指定的行为或事件发生时自动进行更替”。这篇文章探讨了这个看似简单的命题。它探讨了该主张的法律基础和采用原始版本的风险，并考虑了可能纳入审查过程的保障措施，如果在任何情况下对根据事先同意进行的更替的有效性产生担忧的话。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cambridge Law Journal LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Cambridge Law Journal publishes articles on all aspects of law. Special emphasis is placed on contemporary developments, but the journal''s range includes jurisprudence and legal history. An important feature of the journal is the Case and Comment section, in which members of the Cambridge Law Faculty and other distinguished contributors analyse recent judicial decisions, new legislation and current law reform proposals. The articles and case notes are designed to have the widest appeal to those interested in the law - whether as practitioners, students, teachers, judges or administrators - and to provide an opportunity for them to keep abreast of new ideas and the progress of legal reform. Each issue also contains an extensive section of book reviews.