A scoping review of occupational therapy scoping reviews – utilisation of the WFOT proposed international occupational therapy research priority

IF 1.6 Q2 Health Professions
Yuho Okita, Shiho Naga, Takuya Hirose, Syun Takase, Yuto Kishi, Chihori Tsukura, Monique Nair, K. Tomori
{"title":"A scoping review of occupational therapy scoping reviews – utilisation of the WFOT proposed international occupational therapy research priority","authors":"Yuho Okita, Shiho Naga, Takuya Hirose, Syun Takase, Yuto Kishi, Chihori Tsukura, Monique Nair, K. Tomori","doi":"10.1080/14473828.2023.2193007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: This study aims to map existing occupational therapy scoping reviews to identify their characteristics and highlight research priorities to help occupational therapy researchers conduct further research in the eight prioritized research areas proposed by the WFOT Delphi study. Method: The review followed the scoping review guidelines from Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Six electronic databases (PubMed, ProQuest Central, Scopus, CINAHL and AHMED, and Web of Science) were used for the search. The inclusion criteria were set as follows: written in English; related to occupational therapy and scoping reviews. Results: A total of 189 articles were mapped to the WFOT research priorities: Effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions (n = 57); evidence-based practice and knowledge translation (n = 74); healthy aging (n = 26); participation in everyday life (n = 29); occupational therapy professional issues (n = 29); community development and population (n = 10); occupational therapy and chronic conditions (n = 41); technology and occupational therapy (n = 11); and some non-categorized studies. Conclusion: Our findings also support the WFOT study findings indicating the current research focus in evidence-based practice and knowledge transition.","PeriodicalId":53208,"journal":{"name":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","volume":"79 1","pages":"248 - 258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2023.2193007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: This study aims to map existing occupational therapy scoping reviews to identify their characteristics and highlight research priorities to help occupational therapy researchers conduct further research in the eight prioritized research areas proposed by the WFOT Delphi study. Method: The review followed the scoping review guidelines from Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Six electronic databases (PubMed, ProQuest Central, Scopus, CINAHL and AHMED, and Web of Science) were used for the search. The inclusion criteria were set as follows: written in English; related to occupational therapy and scoping reviews. Results: A total of 189 articles were mapped to the WFOT research priorities: Effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions (n = 57); evidence-based practice and knowledge translation (n = 74); healthy aging (n = 26); participation in everyday life (n = 29); occupational therapy professional issues (n = 29); community development and population (n = 10); occupational therapy and chronic conditions (n = 41); technology and occupational therapy (n = 11); and some non-categorized studies. Conclusion: Our findings also support the WFOT study findings indicating the current research focus in evidence-based practice and knowledge transition.
职业治疗范围审查的范围审查——WFOT提议的国际职业治疗研究优先事项的利用
摘要:本研究旨在对现有的职业治疗范围综述进行梳理,识别其特征,并突出研究重点,以帮助职业治疗研究者在WFOT德尔菲研究提出的8个优先研究领域进行进一步的研究。方法:本综述遵循Arksey和O'Malley(2005)的范围综述指南。6个电子数据库(PubMed, ProQuest Central, Scopus, CINAHL and AHMED, Web of Science)被用于检索。纳入标准设定如下:以英文撰写;与职业治疗和范围评估相关。结果:共有189篇文章被映射到WFOT的研究重点:职业治疗干预的有效性(n = 57);循证实践与知识转化(n = 74);健康老龄化(n = 26);参与日常生活(n = 29);职业治疗专业问题(n = 29);社区发展和人口(n = 10);职业治疗和慢性疾病(n = 41);技术和职业治疗(n = 11);还有一些非分类研究。结论:我们的研究结果也支持WFOT的研究结果,表明当前的研究重点是循证实践和知识转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信