The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in patients with biopsy-naïve men according to PSA levels: A propensity score matching analysis

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hye J. Byun , Teak J. Shin , Wonho Jung , Ji Y. Ha , Byung H. Kim , Young H. Kim
{"title":"The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in patients with biopsy-naïve men according to PSA levels: A propensity score matching analysis","authors":"Hye J. Byun ,&nbsp;Teak J. Shin ,&nbsp;Wonho Jung ,&nbsp;Ji Y. Ha ,&nbsp;Byung H. Kim ,&nbsp;Young H. Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2021.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion biopsy in patients with biopsy-naïve men for varying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Since MRI can efficiently detect csPCa compared to standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy; however, the optimal PSA threshold for its use is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed those who underwent MRI/US-fusion and standard biopsy from January 2016 to June 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: PSA &lt;4, 4–10, &gt;10 ng/mL. Propensity scoring was performed to balance the characteristics of the different biopsy groups, and the detection rate of csPCa was compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from a total of 670 males were included in the analysis (standard TRUS, <em>n</em> = 333; MRI/US fusion, <em>n</em> = 337). Prior to matching, patients who received MRI/US-fusion biopsy had lower prostate volume. Propensity score matching balanced this characteristic and generated a cohort comprising 195 patients from each group. In the matched cohort, patients with PSA 4–10 ng/mL had a significantly increased risk of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion vs. standard biopsy (35.0% vs. 26.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.033). However, patients with PSA &lt;4 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (12.0% vs. 16.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.342), whereas, patients with PSA &gt;10 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (78.0% vs. 80.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.596). In multivariate logistic analysis among patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, MRI/US-fusion biopsy (odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.31–4.60, <em>P</em> = 0.005) were significantly associated with a detection of csPCa.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Detection of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion biopsy is more efficient in patients with biopsy-naïve men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL. However, standard TRUS biopsy may identify csPCa in patients with PSA &lt;4 ng/mL and ≥10 ng/mL, emphasizing the importance of performing a standard biopsy in conjunction with MRI/US-fusion biopsy in such populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888221000568/pdfft?md5=f2266bf86ec0532e58544250c43f8fbd&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888221000568-main.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888221000568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion biopsy in patients with biopsy-naïve men for varying prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Since MRI can efficiently detect csPCa compared to standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided biopsy; however, the optimal PSA threshold for its use is unclear.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed those who underwent MRI/US-fusion and standard biopsy from January 2016 to June 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: PSA <4, 4–10, >10 ng/mL. Propensity scoring was performed to balance the characteristics of the different biopsy groups, and the detection rate of csPCa was compared.

Results

Data from a total of 670 males were included in the analysis (standard TRUS, n = 333; MRI/US fusion, n = 337). Prior to matching, patients who received MRI/US-fusion biopsy had lower prostate volume. Propensity score matching balanced this characteristic and generated a cohort comprising 195 patients from each group. In the matched cohort, patients with PSA 4–10 ng/mL had a significantly increased risk of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion vs. standard biopsy (35.0% vs. 26.6%, P = 0.033). However, patients with PSA <4 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (12.0% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.342), whereas, patients with PSA >10 ng/mL had csPCa found by MRI/US-fusion versus standard biopsy (78.0% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.596). In multivariate logistic analysis among patients with PSA 4-10 ng/mL, MRI/US-fusion biopsy (odds ratio: 2.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.31–4.60, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with a detection of csPCa.

Conclusions

Detection of csPCa by MRI/US-fusion biopsy is more efficient in patients with biopsy-naïve men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL. However, standard TRUS biopsy may identify csPCa in patients with PSA <4 ng/mL and ≥10 ng/mL, emphasizing the importance of performing a standard biopsy in conjunction with MRI/US-fusion biopsy in such populations.

根据PSA水平,磁共振成像和超声(MRI/US)融合活检在biopsy-naïve男性患者临床显著前列腺癌检测中的价值:倾向评分匹配分析
目的探讨不同前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平biopsy-naïve男性患者的磁共振与超声融合活检(MRI/US)对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的检出率。由于与标准经直肠超声(TRUS)引导活检相比,MRI可以有效地检测csPCa;然而,其使用的最佳PSA阈值尚不清楚。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2018年6月期间接受MRI/ us融合和标准活检的患者。患者分为PSA 4、4 - 10、10 ng/mL三组。采用倾向评分来平衡不同活检组的特征,并比较csPCa的检出率。结果670例男性纳入分析(标准TRUS, n = 333;MRI/US融合,n = 337)。在匹配之前,接受MRI/ us融合活检的患者前列腺体积较低。倾向评分匹配平衡了这一特征,并产生了一个由每组195名患者组成的队列。在匹配的队列中,PSA为4-10 ng/mL的患者与标准活检相比,MRI/ us融合的csPCa风险显著增加(35.0%对26.6%,P = 0.033)。然而,与标准活检相比,PSA为4 ng/mL的患者MRI/ us融合发现的csPCa(12.0%比16.0%,P = 0.342),而PSA为10 ng/mL的患者MRI/ us融合发现的csPCa与标准活检相比(78.0%比80.0%,P = 0.596)。在PSA 4-10 ng/mL患者的多因素logistic分析中,MRI/ us融合活检(优势比:2.46,95%可信区间= 1.31-4.60,P = 0.005)与csPCa的检测显著相关。结论MRI/ us融合活检在PSA 4-10 ng/mL的biopsy-naïve男性患者中检测csPCa更有效。然而,标准的TRUS活检可以在PSA≤4ng /mL和≥10ng /mL的患者中发现csPCa,强调在这类人群中进行标准活检与MRI/ us融合活检的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信