Tracking ‘Pure’ Systematic Risk with Realized Betas for Bitcoin and Ethereum

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Bilel Sanhaji, Julien Chevallier
{"title":"Tracking ‘Pure’ Systematic Risk with Realized Betas for Bitcoin and Ethereum","authors":"Bilel Sanhaji, Julien Chevallier","doi":"10.3390/econometrics11030019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the capital asset pricing model, this article critically assesses the relative importance of computing ‘realized’ betas from high-frequency returns for Bitcoin and Ethereum—the two major cryptocurrencies—against their classic counterparts using the 1-day and 5-day return-based betas. The sample includes intraday data from 15 May 2018 until 17 January 2023. The microstructure noise is present until 4 min in the BTC and ETH high-frequency data. Therefore, we opt for a conservative choice with a 60 min sampling frequency. Considering 250 trading days as a rolling-window size, we obtain rolling betas < 1 for Bitcoin and Ethereum with respect to the CRIX market index, which could enhance portfolio diversification (at the expense of maximizing returns). We flag the minimal tracking errors at the hourly and daily frequencies. The dispersion of rolling betas is higher for the weekly frequency and is concentrated towards values of β > 0.8 for BTC (β > 0.65 for ETH). The weekly frequency is thus revealed as being less precise for capturing the ‘pure’ systematic risk for Bitcoin and Ethereum. For Ethereum in particular, the availability of high-frequency data tends to produce, on average, a more reliable inference. In the age of financial data feed immediacy, our results strongly suggest to pension fund managers, hedge fund traders, and investment bankers to include ‘realized’ versions of CAPM betas in their dashboard of indicators for portfolio risk estimation. Sensitivity analyses cover jump detection in BTC/ETH high-frequency data (up to 25%). We also include several jump-robust estimators of realized volatility, where realized quadpower volatility prevails.","PeriodicalId":11499,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics11030019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using the capital asset pricing model, this article critically assesses the relative importance of computing ‘realized’ betas from high-frequency returns for Bitcoin and Ethereum—the two major cryptocurrencies—against their classic counterparts using the 1-day and 5-day return-based betas. The sample includes intraday data from 15 May 2018 until 17 January 2023. The microstructure noise is present until 4 min in the BTC and ETH high-frequency data. Therefore, we opt for a conservative choice with a 60 min sampling frequency. Considering 250 trading days as a rolling-window size, we obtain rolling betas < 1 for Bitcoin and Ethereum with respect to the CRIX market index, which could enhance portfolio diversification (at the expense of maximizing returns). We flag the minimal tracking errors at the hourly and daily frequencies. The dispersion of rolling betas is higher for the weekly frequency and is concentrated towards values of β > 0.8 for BTC (β > 0.65 for ETH). The weekly frequency is thus revealed as being less precise for capturing the ‘pure’ systematic risk for Bitcoin and Ethereum. For Ethereum in particular, the availability of high-frequency data tends to produce, on average, a more reliable inference. In the age of financial data feed immediacy, our results strongly suggest to pension fund managers, hedge fund traders, and investment bankers to include ‘realized’ versions of CAPM betas in their dashboard of indicators for portfolio risk estimation. Sensitivity analyses cover jump detection in BTC/ETH high-frequency data (up to 25%). We also include several jump-robust estimators of realized volatility, where realized quadpower volatility prevails.
追踪比特币和以太坊的“纯粹”系统风险
使用资本资产定价模型,本文批判性地评估了从比特币和以太坊这两种主要加密货币的高频回报计算“已实现”贝塔与使用基于1天和5天回报的经典贝塔的相对重要性。样本包括2018年5月15日至2023年1月17日的盘中数据。微结构噪声在BTC和ETH高频数据中一直存在到4分钟。因此,我们选择了60分钟采样频率的保守选择。考虑到250个交易日是一个滚动窗口大小,我们获得了比特币和以太坊相对于CRIX市场指数的滚动贝塔<1,这可以增强投资组合的多样化(以最大化回报为代价)。我们标记每小时和每天频率的最小跟踪误差。滚动β的分散度对于周频率更高,并且集中在BTC的β>0.8的值(ETH的β>0.65)。因此,每周频率对于捕捉比特币和以太坊的“纯粹”系统风险来说不太准确。特别是对以太坊来说,高频数据的可用性往往会产生更可靠的推断。在金融数据即时性时代,我们的研究结果强烈建议养老基金经理、对冲基金交易员和投资银行家将CAPM贝塔的“已实现”版本纳入其投资组合风险估计指标仪表板中。灵敏度分析涵盖BTC/ETH高频数据中的跳跃检测(高达25%)。我们还包括实现波动率的几个跳跃鲁棒估计,其中实现四次方波动率占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Econometrics
Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信