Evaluation of Medical Students' Satisfaction with the Virtual Assessment of Cardiac Physiology Course

Seyedeh Zeinab Ghaheri, F. Maghsoudi, S. Mobarak, E. Radmanesh
{"title":"Evaluation of Medical Students' Satisfaction with the Virtual Assessment of Cardiac Physiology Course","authors":"Seyedeh Zeinab Ghaheri, F. Maghsoudi, S. Mobarak, E. Radmanesh","doi":"10.5812/erms-122572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Universities have switched to virtual assessments due to the spread of COVID-19 around the world. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction level of medical students at the Abadan University of Medical Sciences (AUMS) with the virtual assessment methods of the cardiac physiology course. Methods: This study was conducted on 42 medical students of AUMS who were in the second semester of 2020 - 2021 (COVID-19 pandemic) and participated in the cardiac physiology course. Researchers developed an online questionnaire with 17 questions about students' satisfaction with assessment methods. Data were collected and organized in SPSS Software Version 21 for descriptive statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.4 ± 2.08 years, of whom 76.2% (32) agreed that a higher percentage of the score should relate to the virtual formative assessment and 78.6% (33) experienced more stress in virtual summative assessment compared to the formative method. About 93.6% (39) agreed that all virtual summative assessment questions should be multiple-choice, and 88.4% (37) believed that allocating 1 to 2 minutes for each multiple-choice summative assessment question lowers their stress levels. Conclusions: According to the results, the virtual formative assessment had an accepted place in the cardiac physiology course and helped students reduce stress and learn more. The students preferred summative assessment questions to be multiple-choice due to the difficulty of the cardiac physiology course. More research should be conducted on this subject with a larger sample size in future studies.","PeriodicalId":32200,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/erms-122572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Universities have switched to virtual assessments due to the spread of COVID-19 around the world. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the satisfaction level of medical students at the Abadan University of Medical Sciences (AUMS) with the virtual assessment methods of the cardiac physiology course. Methods: This study was conducted on 42 medical students of AUMS who were in the second semester of 2020 - 2021 (COVID-19 pandemic) and participated in the cardiac physiology course. Researchers developed an online questionnaire with 17 questions about students' satisfaction with assessment methods. Data were collected and organized in SPSS Software Version 21 for descriptive statistical analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 21.4 ± 2.08 years, of whom 76.2% (32) agreed that a higher percentage of the score should relate to the virtual formative assessment and 78.6% (33) experienced more stress in virtual summative assessment compared to the formative method. About 93.6% (39) agreed that all virtual summative assessment questions should be multiple-choice, and 88.4% (37) believed that allocating 1 to 2 minutes for each multiple-choice summative assessment question lowers their stress levels. Conclusions: According to the results, the virtual formative assessment had an accepted place in the cardiac physiology course and helped students reduce stress and learn more. The students preferred summative assessment questions to be multiple-choice due to the difficulty of the cardiac physiology course. More research should be conducted on this subject with a larger sample size in future studies.
医学生对心脏生理学课程虚拟评估的满意度评价
背景:由于新冠肺炎在世界各地的传播,大学已转向虚拟评估。因此,本研究旨在采用心脏生理学课程的虚拟评估方法来评估阿巴丹医科大学医学生的满意度。方法:对参加新冠肺炎大流行病2020-2021年下学期心脏生理学课程的42名AUMS医学生进行研究。研究人员开发了一份在线问卷,其中包含17个关于学生对评估方法满意度的问题。数据收集并组织在SPSS软件版本21中进行描述性统计分析。结果:参与者的平均年龄为21.4±2.08岁,其中76.2%(32)的人同意更高比例的分数应与虚拟形成性评估有关,78.6%(33)的人在虚拟总结性评估中经历了比形成性方法更大的压力。约93.6%(39)的人同意所有虚拟总结性评估题都应该是多项选择题,88.4%(37)的人认为为每个多项选择性总结性评估问题分配1到2分钟可以降低他们的压力水平。结论:根据研究结果,虚拟形成性评估在心脏生理学课程中具有可接受的地位,有助于学生减轻压力,学习更多。由于心脏生理学课程的难度,学生们倾向于将总结性评估问题作为多项选择题。在未来的研究中,应该以更大的样本量对这一主题进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信